MovieChat Forums > Treasure Island (2012) Discussion > This is by far the worst adaption ever m...

This is by far the worst adaption ever made!


I was looking forward to this! The great cast (Glenister, Penry-Jones, Mays, Izzard) should have guaranteed a great movie. Well, it didn't!

Firstly, what about the historical inaccuracies? Granted, they probably couldn't find a seaworthy ship from the proper era, but what about the props? Can't be to hard to find guns from that era instead of rummaging through Sharpe's prop-box.
As well, what about the non-europeans? Granted, there was the odd black fellow in piracy, but surely not on a merchant ship and definitely not as first mate! And the guys from asia? Chinese, malayan, melanesian? How did they find there way to Bristol? And back to the ship: It seems that ever since Pirates of the Caribbean writers seem to think that ships requiring a crew from at least 50 (in this movie) or 200 (PotC) can just as well be sailed by one or two fellows.

And then the characters: Why, why in god's name, change them all? They have nothing to do with the novel but are just modern cliches slapped on the original characters. The rich landowner has, of course, to be a greedy, immoral bastard, because rich people are like that! The doctor is a drunkard and a coward, and then suddenly changes his character 180° degrees, so that the audience can see, that every man can change for the better when he needs to.

Long John is just a poor, misunderstood philosopher who wants nothing more than to live a life without worries, married to his sweetheart whom he saved from prostitution. Nevermind the scores of people he killed.

Even the badest badass in this movie, Israel Hands, is really only a victim, as he was pressed into service as a boy and thus can't really be held responsible for his actions.

Oh, nearly forgot: Which idiot built that stronghold five feet from the sea? The pirates really only had to bring their ship in just a little bit closer and a broadside would have blown that place to kingdom come and saved us from suffering through this sorry efforts ending.

=== SPOILERS FROM HERE ===

Well, the ending. After killing and maiming, being killed and being maimed, young Jim suddenly decides to throw the whole goddam treasure overboard, not thinking about the debt his mother has or that they both will probably end up in the poor house or as slaves in the colonies. And the rest actually helped him. The helmsman will stay a helmsman for the rest of his life, the poor doctor won't get to marry Jim's mom and the skipper won't be able to pay the rent on his house as he doesn't get paid for that journey.

At least, that's what would happen IRL, though this movie seems to be teaching us, that throwing money away is a good thing, because you'll get money from somewhere else anyway. Sounds to be inspired by the Euro crisis.

Oh yes, and after they dropped the treasure into the waves, the captain said "let's sail to Jamaica and crew up". Someone should have spoken up and said: "Uhm, skipper, we just threw all our gold overboard. Gonna be hard finding hands of we can't pay 'em! Arr!"

reply

I pretty much agree with everything you said, including the last paragraph! What an utter waste of at least a few fine actors - Philip Glenister in particular, who could have given us a Smollett to NEARLY rival Clive Wood's in the 1990 version (I say nearly, because I don't think you can touch the perfection that is Wood's Smollett, not least in the fight for the stockade), but then the script so messed with his character that there wasn't much even Glenister could do with it. (I say that with some shock, after worshipping at the feet of his Gene Hunt... and damn near every other role I've seen him in.) His publicity shot as Smollett looked fantastic... except for the pink breeches. What on earth was the costume designer thinking? (And what about that clown suit on the squire - he's meant to be a bit vain, not tricked out like an insane third world dictator!)

The very idea that a captain would agree the treasure was so tainted he could just do without it.... Yes, let's all go home and STARVE because that's what you did in the 18th century without money. (But of course, they wouldn't have made it to Bristol in the first place... no crew. Argh!) Jim's mum and Silver's wife can starve or work in a whorehouse for the rest of their lives, or die in a ditch, because some men decided that they didn't actually need the king's ransom they had safely in the hold.

They also bastardized the wonderful Dr. Livesey, turning that clever and honorable gentleman into a drunkard and a coward who must be redeemed. Yes, because this is the modern scriptwriter's LAZY idea of a character arc.

I won't even talk about Jim, the kid that would rather be tortured by pirates than go back on his word... in any proper version!

reply

Couldn't agree more with both posts.
This was a steaming pile of *beep* of the highest order!

reply

Have to agree with you. Midway through, when the squire turned into a jackass of the highest order (and OF COURSE he was the only one who believed in God), I started to realize -- this is what happens when you turn classic literature over to second-rate, politically correct modern writers.

What a total MESS, and what an INSULT.

reply


I wouldn't call this an adaptation. It is a totally different story from the original R.L.Stevenson's book, which I have read many times.
Someone should prohibit using a famous book name as a title for a movie when it does not follow the original story.
It is not worth sitting in front of a TV set and wasting one's time
My vote shows 1 because there is no way to value it as "0" or negative score

By the way, it can't be worse. Luckily Mr Stevenson can not see it

Dr. Emilio Brunetti

reply

Long John is just a poor, misunderstood philosopher who wants nothing more than to live a life without worries, married to his sweetheart whom he saved from prostitution. Nevermind the scores of people he killed.


Some of that actually was in the book. Not how he met her, or where she was while he was off getting the treasure, but the fact that he intended to meet up with his wife and set himself up as a gentleman is mentioned when Jim is hiding in the apple barrel. And yes, she was black. That wasn't some nonhistorical pc thing or whatever you want to call it.

reply

Even at the end of the book, Jim says he imagined he found her again and they are happy.

reply

the difference between this and most other adaptations from literature is that most cut things from the book. this one at least went the other way, and added a bit. i personally enjoyed the changing of squire trelawney and dr. livesy's characters, as in the book they were effectively cardboard cutouts, very similar in personality to captain smollett. the expansion of the voyage itself was nice. what do we get in the book? a chapter? which can basically be summed up as 'arrow disappeared, silver is cultivating a mutiny, jim took a nap in the apple barrel'.
as far as the comment about 'guns from the era', i dunno about you, but i can't tell a flintlock pistol from 1765 from one from 1835, especially when they're being waved around on screen. and what is this 'sharpe's prop box' you're talking about?
i'm more surprised you didn't mention that the hispaniola is specifically mentioned as being a schooner in the book, yet she's square-rigged in the movie. we'll skip the bit about the non-europeans, except for saying that i did enjoy their performances, and go straight to crew size... you mention the source material several times, yet, in the book, mr. hands and jim do exactly what you see on the screen. bear in mind, though robert louis stevenson may have been a master of prose, he actually had no sailing experience or familiarity with maritime or piratical history... he was just making it up.
as far as the pirates being able to broadside the fort, the ship is never presented as having more than one cannon in the bow, in either book or movie.

it's never demonstrated that jim is aware of the inn's status, or that his mother was evicted. he was just a teenager, doing one of those irrational things all teenagers tend to do at some point, which is to follow what their heart says, regardless of other consequences. and the squire likely had a good stash of cash on board, with which they could have paid whomever they hired in jamaica.

"Cinema was made for fantasy, rather than normal types of stories." - Ray Harryhausen

reply