lol @ the front page review


Now I KNOW these 33 10-star ratings are bullsh't.

This movie is not out, and judging on the trailer alone I can tell that it is going to suck ass.

Lets not get started with a silly concept like 'melting sand will also melt the coin', which is obvious to anyone with IQ north of 50. Instead, this movie tries to tie a traveling salesman problem into everything else where network analysis can be used, and it fails to do so. There is drama without substance, a Hollywood-style circle-jerk of pretentious little douches that think they understand something and then try to make a movie that reflects on the feeling of understanding that something. You did not earn the right to feel like you understand it, since clearly you don't understand it. This is why a lot of these Hollywood flicks suck - they did not take the time to understand the problem fully in order to grasp of what it feels like to not understand it, to go through the agony of searching for a solution. This movie lacks humility and intelligence, and takes itself too seriously.


even if he happens to be right and the movie does suck, I don't think I've seen such a prime example of some obnoxious twat managing to top the shenanigans he's whining about with his own. well done, please stop stringing together thoughts in rooms with internet access.

reply

[deleted]

It's easy, just ignore all the "user" reviews. So many are obviously shills, and/or trolls. Just go to the "Critic's reviews": and even there, look for reputable journals or website you trust.

Only time I look at user reviews is when a film has no info about it at all, not even plot summary, which happens with some low budget films. But I won't believe any random guy who says how great it is.
But his one has several reviews from e.g. Wired. Also a few from Science journals like New Scientist.

reply

[deleted]