Title


why the title change?

reply

I hate it when they do this!! REPLICAS was MUCH better.

reply

I loved the title REPLICAS too. IN THEIR SKIN seems so... generic?

reply

Did they change it back already? It wasn't showing up at IMDb under Replicas any longer but now it is again. Weird.


www.selmablairstyle.com

reply

maybe they thought Replicas sounded too much like a science fiction movie.

reply

Agreeing with the other posts here. Both |"Replicant" and "Replica" are low budget sci-fi movies so I can see where that might lead us to think Replicas as sci-fi instead of thriller.


How does one eat an Ice Cream Sundae in the Matrix?

reply

"In their skin" looks like mysterious, gutural, possibly hurtful and Almodovarian.

A little piece of advice: Replicas would be more fair to the audience, this is an awful lame movie.

reply

I agree. Lame, trite, and predictable.

reply