MovieChat Forums > A Christmas Kiss (2011) Discussion > Elizabeth Rohm's character is not a 'b**...

Elizabeth Rohm's character is not a 'b**ch'


I see several people interpret Rohm's character (Wendy's boss) as a "beyotch" and other silly cover words. I disagree. In fact, I think she is a lonely woman, driven by sucess (and who has achieved it) who finds her one chance at the relationship she wants, threatened and slipping from her grasp. Is she a tough boss? Of course -- ever work for a Type-A successful personality? She nails it here. I think she is a better-written character than just some "evil." Not all in life is black or white.

reply

Possessing a 'type A' personality doesn't excuse someone from not being nice. The problem with many type A's is that they think they can treat people like crap and it's okay. I think every rude, mean, or bitchy 'type A' should be treated the same way in return. That way maybe, just maybe, receiving a dose of their own medicine will help them change for the better. Plus, she definitely is a thief and a bitch for stealing Wendy's ideas and presenting them as her own.

reply

Plus, she definitely is a thief and a bitch for stealing Wendy's ideas and presenting them as her own.

She was within her rights to use the ideas but she should/could have admitted they were her employee's.

reply

For the most part, we don't choose our personalities, any more than we choose our looks. "Type A" has nothing to do with how people are treated. You don't know enough (obviously) about the subject matter to speak on it. There are no generalizations that are accurate about treating others based on personality type. That's like saying a "Type Z" personality (really, really shy and standoffish people) are so nasty. They think they're better than we are, won't even speak to us, etc. Two different things entirely that may or may not follow conventions.

reply

I agree that no one is just a straight-up "beyotch" - people are more complex than that and usually the cruelest people are often also emotionally wounded or insecure. BUT this is a tv movie we're talking about, a genre that is hardly known for its subtly in story-telling or writing, but more for stereotyping or corny, contrived situations, so it's really hard to give the writers the benefit of the doubt that there's meant to be more under the surface.

Being a tough or demanding boss is one thing, but she also harshly insults her assistant's (voluntary) work and five minutes later takes complete credit for ideas she apparently considers "repellant." A stern but professional superior might say "These sketches are inappropriate for this project, no thank you, now please get on board with the ideas we ARE presenting." A cruel person attacks someone for work that isn't to their taste or mocks them to cover up their anxiety that it might be better.

She does have a right to incorporate concepts her assistant presented to her for their supposed collaboration (though she did them without being instructed to and in her free time), but purposely not giving her any credit is wrong. The boss even realizes it's shady (or at least that the distinction would matter to Adam), that's why she has to threaten Wendy's future career to keep her quiet. She also admits that she manipulates her whole relationship with him, largely because of his wealth/influence, and doesn't even give him the option to propose or not - she steals the ring and proposes to herself! A bully even to the man she supposedly loves... "Egomaniacal" is a better word for the character.

reply

I see that. But her manipulation arises from her insecurity. Had she any self-confidence, or felt at all secure in the thought that she deserves and would and could catch a handsome successful man, she would not have the need to resort to such puerile tactics.

As for her treatment of her assistant, it begins as a straightforward "strong-boss, learning intern" type of thing, but as she sees her more and more as a threat, she becomes increasingly hostile and undermining. No, she should never have taken credit nor failed to give credit, that was awful and displays her character flaws, but that also happens A LOT with driven bosses who fear the rising tide of new talent.

reply

Everybody gets insecure sometimes, but only a b**ch deals with it by being a b**ch.

Just because you understand the mechanics of how something works doesn't make it any less of a miracle

reply

She was fairly sympathetic up until the point that she stole her assistant's designs. One could argue that she was Type A, a bit controlling, etc. (though having her assistant act as her maid was a *bit* over the top), and that the real problem with her boyfriend was that they simply weren't compatible and she was in denial about that. Bitchy but not necessarily evil.

But stealing the designs was illegal, unethical, and just plain wrong. Yes, Wendy is working for her, *but* she came up with the designs on her own and after she offered them, Priscilla rejected them. The second Priscilla did that, she relinquished any legal right to them. Basically, she released her option on them. Bigger people have lost their careers over such things.

I figured that twist would happen, though, since this is a pretty unacknowledged retread of Working Girl and that's what happened in that film, too (and Sigourney Weaver's evil boss got fired over it).

Innsmouth Free Press http://www.innsmouthfreepress.com

reply

Sorry cwg2005a but I have to disagree. She is cold and selfish. While she may care for Adam, it's his wealth and his family's prestige that matter more to her than love. She goes so far as to spell that out to Wendy, plus, she knows almost nothing of his close relationship with his grandmother, and clearly doesn't know or care about his taste, which is why Priscilla gets the holiday party designs completely wrong for what he wants. Added to that the taking credit for Wendy's spot on design plans just to look good in his eyes is low. Plus, she shows her desperation to not lose her ticket to high society by searching his room for the engagement ring, and steam rolling over the fact that he never actually popped the question. Her posing as an anonymous "friend of the couple" and leaking news of the fake engagement to the society pages in the paper was pretty sleazy.

All that aside, however, I love Elizabeth Rohm and think she was excellent in this role. She was almost too good, because it was hard for me to have any sympathy for her character simply because she played the part so well!

The night is dark, and full of terrors.

reply

I agree, one of the reasons I enjoyed this one was Rohm's delicious evilness. check out Christmas Kiss 2: She returns wiser and and with a new real love, now that she has learned her lesson. I love redemption.

reply

It is not bad to know what you want, what makes her bad person is how manipulative she is. She "forces" him into an engagement and chooses him because of his lifestyle? She sells the other girl's design as her own, which is stealing. Sorry but apart from commiting a crime what makes a person evil in your opinion?

===========
http://Lorcagonzalez.blogspot.com
http://lorca-movies-reviews.blogspot.com

reply

I don't believe the discussion is whether or not she is "evil," but whether she is a btch.

reply

This is a bit of a definition, but she is definetely not a good person...

===========
http://Lorcagonzalez.blogspot.com
http://lorca-movies-reviews.blogspot.com

reply

You're on crack.

That character was SO nasty that she was practically a caricature of an actual person.

I think they went about 86.5 miles overboard with it though.

We could have 'hated' her with much less.

reply

[deleted]

~ Of course Wendy's boss was a bitch, but I admit that I've seen worst bitches than that woman. Also she wasn't very smart either for staying away from her man for such along time.😏


*~~*



*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
🎶
De aquel amor
de musica ligera
nada nos libra
nada mas queda

- Soda Stereo 🎤

Descanse en paz Gustavo Cerati

reply

I thought her character was deluded. She had no real understanding of love, his mood or background, zero listening skills, and worst of all she always wanted more when she virtually had everything already. She was also a pathological liar to her boyfriend and was constantly trying to manipulate him for her own gains – what she thought was best at all times. His dumping her was the best thing that will probably ever happen for her. It's only then that she may eventually come to an understanding of what genuine love is.

reply

Priscilla was very *itchy! I guess it hits a nerve with you. She thought she was better than Wendy! She didn't care who she hurt or step on to get what she wanted. There is nothing wrong with being assertive but Priscilla was aggressive!

reply

I would not want to be friends with the OP, if that is her way of thinking.....man, what a bitch that woman was!!!!

reply

I agree, she fought for her man, and Adam was no gentleman; for him to take off the ring from Priscilla while she was on the floor with possibly a broken nose, is simply despicable!

reply

Sorry but she deserved it! - After what she did? and furthermore - what was she doing back stage? She most certainly wasn't invited there!

reply