How influential was Punk magazine, really? (possible spoilers)
I am curious because supposedly this movie claims that punk started with the magazine and that seems highly unlikely, especially with later scenes showing the people of the magazine trying to get chance interviews with established musicians (Especially Lou Reed being interviewed at CBGBs for the inaugural first issue) when the club was already opened and operating.
In addition, I met John Holmstrom at a comic book convention last year where at his panel I asked various questions to about certain bands and singers that were part of the punk scene (including Stiv Bators and the Dead Boys) that influenced other genres such as Goth Rock (one of those Goth bands being Stiv Bators, lead singer of The Lords of the New Church) that I enjoy much and asked if he had any knowledge of why many Punks progressed to Goth . He deflected my questions and claimed that he "got out of the scene" when it became in his eyes "political", so he didn't keep track of bands past the early to mid 80s (though I pointed out that's when the changes occurred and the Goth Rock scene started in England and the US). So I was kinda confused on how a self proclaimed "historian of Punk" would just drop all connections to the scene after a certain time period and not archive anything happening after something happened to the bands which in he disagreed with it.
With the film being created as sort of a "inside the comic book" design and at the end the name dropping of various bands with no mention of their progression beyond that time, was Holmstrom primarily responsible for that? (Mainly because it seems like they took most of his information from him about CBGB and the punk scene than other sources) Just really curious as it seems like with the opening scene seems to be more of a "pat on the back" for Holmstrom (as well as the comic design of the film) than a genuine explanation of how the punk scene really formed at CBGB.