MovieChat Forums > Amanda Knox (2011) Discussion > English translation of the Supreme Court...

English translation of the Supreme Court motivational report

posted 8 years ago by Corpus_Vile
23 replies | jump to latest

http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/docupl/spublic/filelibrary2/updates/151114/2015-09-07-Motivations-Cassazione-Marasca-Bruno-Appeal-Knox-Sollecito-annulling-sentence-against-Knox-Sollecito-translation-TJMK-pre-final.pdf

Three questions for Amanda Knox's supporters.

1) Do you regard the logic and reasoning of this report as sound?
2) If so, do you apply the same reasoning to Rudy Guede?
3) If not, were Knox and Sollecito acquitted on flawed grounds?

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

Amazing how I get crickets to these questions. Which is odd, if the argument for innocent Amanda's innocence is so strong.

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Lyndhen 8 years ago

Three questions for Amanda Knox's supporters.

Evidently, they are not interested.

[–] pete-293 8 years ago

or perhaps since some many bad translations have been posted on these boards, Knox supporters do not trust this one and therefore see no reason to respond to it.

Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain (Isaac Asimov)

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

Ah.
The cops were wrong
The evidence was wrong
The witnesses were wrong
The expert witnesses were wrong
The prosecution was wrong
The judges were wrong
And now, the reports have been wrongly translated. Gotcha.

So yet again, Knox supporters refuse to actually back up their position by attempting to credibly explain Cassatio's reasoning, showing again what blowhards they are who only care about the verdict, even if they can't plausibly justify it.

So all the report is mistranslated pete, is that your contention? Including the double standards, the lie about the fried hard drives and the citing of non existent international DNA standards?
What parts specifically are not translated properly? 

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

Evidently, you can't answer them, which is odd, seeing as innocent Amanda is so innocent.

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Lyndhen 8 years ago

I've never been interested in discussing the question of guilt or innocence in this case - as I have pointed out to you before.

I'm only interested in those who lie and try to twist the record.

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

I know, you're only interested in cheerleading for a nonce, your past dishonest attempt to pass of Guede's trial and the Matteini hearing as Knox's trial demonstrated that quite aptly, thanks.

I'm only interested in those who lie and try to twist the record.

!! See above and name one lies I've told thanks.

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Lyndhen 8 years ago

I know, you're only interested in cheerleading for a nonce,

Now you bring the subject up (again). I note that you mentioned debating with holocaust deniers and 'paedophiles'. I'm very concerned that you debate with paedophiles. If you have the misfortune to meet one irl or on line then I believe the responsible action is to report them to the relevant authority. not debate them.

You evidently lied when you said your work here was done.

and in addition to lying and twisting you are also very rude.

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

It's not illegal to be a paedophile or illegal to claim to be one on the internet and I'm sorry you're too stupid to realise this and that you didn't heed my heads up about people not dumbing down to indulge your stupidity.
Can you answer the questions in the OP or are you still unable or unwilling to do so? Seeing as how innocent Amanda is so innocent and railroaded and wrongfully accused etc ad nauseam?

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Lyndhen 8 years ago

Actually I'm not going to discuss paedophilia with you and I can't imagine why you would want to discuss it rather than report it. I'm not going to discuss this further. thank you.

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

I'm not discussing it either, I'm simply educating you that it's not illegal to be a paedophile and your ignorance is your problem. You moron.
You murderer advocates are even creepier than paedos though. Sucks to be you.

Are you gonna answer my questions in the OP, troll, or bluster some more?

1) Do you regard the logic and reasoning of this report as sound?
2) If so, do you apply the same reasoning to Rudy Guede?
3) If not, were Knox and Sollecito acquitted on flawed grounds?

Odd you're unwilling or unable to answer, if your case is so strong, innit? 

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Lyndhen 8 years ago

Actually I'm not going to discuss paedophilia with you and I can't imagine why you would want to discuss it rather than report it. I'm not going to discuss this further. thank you.

And it's not a laughing matter, is it.

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

We're not discussing paedophilia,. Learn to read you complete and utter turnip. I merely said you're creepier than pasedos, we're discussing Cassation's report or rather I keep asking you to address the report, seeing as you keep citing it to falsely proclaim Knox being found innocent, and you keep trolling and evading and refusing to address it and refusing to back up your crap as is plain for anyone reading to see.

Now onto other matters- you were about to answer my questions to back up your position or else concede that you can't address them. Here they are again:
Are you gonna answer my questions in the OP, troll, or bluster some more?

1) Do you regard the logic and reasoning of this report as sound?
2) If so, do you apply the same reasoning to Rudy Guede?
3) If not, were Knox and Sollecito acquitted on flawed grounds?

Are you gonna answer my questions in the OP, troll, or are you gonna well, troll some more? Are you prepared to address these questions or do you concede that you're unable or unwilling to? If so, I'll accept your defeat with good grace. I'd expect no less from a murderer groupie like you anyway.

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Lyndhen 8 years ago

We're not discussing paedophilia,.

You seem the one who is constantly bringing it and nonces up, mate. The mind boggles what you supposedly argue about with these people. I can't see why one wouldn't go straight to flag, report - or the equivalent. Anyway, I certainly will do that if you persist on this subject.

Three questions for Amanda Knox's supporters.

1) Do you regard the logic and reasoning of this report as sound?
2) If so, do you apply the same reasoning to Rudy Guede?
3) If not, were Knox and Sollecito acquitted on flawed grounds

I'm not a 'knox supporter'.

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

No I just think you Amandafans are creepier than paedos. A nonce is a sex offender. Not all paedos are, you're simply too obtuse to realise this.

Yes you are and is this yet another avenue for evasion and trolling for you?
Let's try again troll and see how many times you dance, shall we?

1) Do you regard the logic and reasoning of this report as sound?
2) If so, do you apply the same reasoning to Rudy Guede?
3) If not, were Knox and Sollecito acquitted on flawed grounds?
You should have no problem addressing these questions, since your argument is so strong, so yet again... whenever you're ready. (Which of course will be never as you're not the slightest bit interested in honest discourse, as anyone reading your tiresome trolling can easily see.)

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Lyndhen 8 years ago

No I just think you Amandafans are creepier than paedos.

You're clearly sick

A nonce is a sex offender. Not all paedos are, you're simply too obtuse to realise this.

maybe you're the expert here.

Let's try again troll and see how many times you dance, shall we?

I'm not a knox supporter. You have the whole board here. I've posted on occasion over the years. Go and find one of my posts that argues for the innocence or guilt of the accused if you don't believe me.

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

So you are gonna attempt new avenues for evasion and trolling, just as I predicted. Your use of the lexicon "guilter" was a dead giveaway as was your deliberate attempts at dishonesty.

Gonna answer the questions troll? Seeing as you cite Cassation's verdict as justification for whatever it is you babble in your posts?
1) Do you regard the logic and reasoning of this report as sound?
2) If so, do you apply the same reasoning to Rudy Guede?
3) If not, were Knox and Sollecito acquitted on flawed grounds?
Well?

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Lyndhen 8 years ago

I'm not a knox supporter and I'm not particularly interested in discussing a complex case with you when you have extreme difficulty understanding the very basics. Further, your bias leads you to misrepresent and twist in such a way that any intelligent discussion is impossible.

However, I am interested in you people who obsess about this case. Do you seriously think that someone who thinks Amanda Knox (and Sollecito - don't forget) is innocent is worse than a paedophile?

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

1) Do you regard the logic and reasoning of this report as sound?
2) If so, do you apply the same reasoning to Rudy Guede?
3) If not, were Knox and Sollecito acquitted on flawed grounds?

Still waiting for you to answer troll. I see you've decided to troll some more rather than back up your position.

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] Lyndhen 8 years ago

I'm not a knox supporter and you said that the questions were for knox supporters

Do you really believe that knox supporters are worse than paedophiles?

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

1) Do you regard the logic and reasoning of this report as sound?
2) If so, do you apply the same reasoning to Rudy Guede?
3) If not, were Knox and Sollecito acquitted on flawed grounds?

Still waiting for you to answer troll. I see you've decided to troll some more rather than back up your position.

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!

[–] pete-293 8 years ago

I'm still waiting for you to say she is innocent of the crime because she is innocent.

Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain (Isaac Asimov)

[–] Corpus_Vile 8 years ago

I was responding to that other moron, not you pete. I have no intention of declaring that she's innocent of the crime as she isn't innocent.
If your case was so strong, you'd address Cassation's report, rather than run away from it and falsely opine that the translation is wrong. You can't even credibly justify the verdict. You'd be easily able to address Cassation's report and wouldn't be unwilling t answer three simple questions, if you could.
Provide the verbatim quote where Cassation declare Knox "innocent" of Meredith's murder. (Good luck with that too.)

Hey, look at that! She's not crazy, she's being chased by a cheetah!