0% so far on RT
Ouch
shareThat's because critics, unlike majority of average ppl, don't go to the movies for fun or r & r. More importantly, most critics are biased towards art-house films and also favor independent films with smaller marketing budgets, such as The Hurt Locker, against commercial blockbusters.
Personally, if and when I read what others have to say, I prefer film reviewers over critics.
My IMDb credentials:
www.imdb.com/user/ur7441441/comments-expanded?start=0&order=alpha
No, it's because the movie is a massive pile of S@%t.
share
Nope. The film is just flat out terrible.
----
Personally, if and when I read what others have to say, I prefer film reviewers over critics.
It's up to 5% now.
"We don't make movies for critics, since they don't pay to see them anyhow." - Charles Bronson
[deleted]
Yeah, well Rotten Tomatoes suck. They like boring self-indulgent movies like "Lost in Translation".
shareYeah... There's a reason it's THAT low
share