Yeah the dude who made the play came off like a real jerk. 'Art isn't recording the artifact, it's what you make based off of it' or some such nonsense, which really amounted to him patting his own back and putting them down.
I had a hard time believing they offered to give him 50% of any future grosses when they owned the tapes (and subsequent copyright) and were approached by a studio person already. Didn't make any sense that they'd just say 'sure, you made an awful, short, and redundant play, can we give you 50% of any deals?'
Both the play and movie looked terrible, I agree!
"dude i dont care i just love this movie you guys have a realy taste in movies what wrong with you"
reply
share