Would have been better off.....

Argh that shouldn't be a question mark

Income inequality increases because more and more people are becoming dependent on the government rather than getting off their behinds and making something of themselves. Barack Obama believes that anyone who has millions of dollars is just evil and greedy (although he himself makes a base of $440K/yr AND $5M/yr from book deals AND who knows how much else from back door deals). Mitt Romney is worth $250M and he believes that everyone should have $250M.

But, how does one attain that much money? By gaining knowledge & skills and then applying them by working like crazy. You never see our current president encouraging people on welfare to go make themselves more valuable, contribute to society and earn wealth. No, he wants to keep them dependent so he and the succeeding Democrats have ample voting stock (see President Lyndon B. Johnson for how he'll "...have those n**gers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.")

More people have been put on food stamps than have gotten jobs under President Obama. If the president really wanted to create jobs, he would slash as many taxes as possible and remove the Corporate Tax. By doing so, the economy would ignite bigger and faster than it ever has. Every company in the world would be headquartered in the U.S. The more money freed from taxation, the more money a company has to invest back into itself and into other companies and that results in creating a larger economy, thus more jobs.

The president certainly understands this, but he doesn't want the economy to grow. He wants to shrink and eventually remove the middle class and only have the lower class (the Proletariat) and the super rich (the Bourgeoisie). And how do you succeed to remove the middle class? By touting the illusion that you're "for the middle class!" Brilliant, no? While saying that you're for the middle class, it keeps them distracted because they believe everything you're doing is for their benefit, while you destroy them through endless regulations and lawless executive orders that override and don't even include Congress. ObamaCare is nothing more than redistribution of wealth. The president even had to find a Constitutional loophole just to implement at a point when 70% of the American people were against it. By implementing ObamaCare as a tax, he can now force people to purchase something and fine them if they don't. How is that "caring for the American people"?

The president made his goal quite clear when he spoke to Joe the Plumber in 2008. "...when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody." That's not how America works. If you don't like the Capitalist system, where hard work is rewarded and do-nothings get nothing then move out of America. Don't try to change something that obviously works (look what all we've built, created and done in our short time as a country).

Spreading the wealth helps absolutely no one in society. If Marxism/Socialism were implemented, you would see an immediate drop in innovation and creation. Why? There would be no incentive to succeed from the fruits of your labor and inventions if all your wealth was distributed around without any say on how it's done. Remember this: forced charity is not charity, it's slavery.

If you're for redistribution of wealth, here's an idea. I'm going to take your cell phone, computer, TV and your car. We're going to sell these items and we should get roughly $10,000 for these items. We're going to take that $10,000 and go downtown to the projects and distribute this money. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." This is what you believe, right? Fair game!

Or how about this: You make $60,000/yr and I make $20,000/yr. Well, I don't think that's fair at all! Sure, you worked hard to get where you are, but I'm perfectly happy with where I am, but that doesn't mean there should be this gap between us. So, here's what we're going to do: We're going to add our incomes and split the total. We both get $40,000/yr while we both still perform the same jobs that require the same skills. Nothing has changed except for the redistribution. You don't mind taking $20,000/yr paycut to help me out, do you? Do you? Of course you do! You worked hard to reach that income level and here I am, a person with no ambition to succeed benefiting from your accomplishments while doing no extra work on my part.

Does that sound fair to you? Here you are a person that worked hard for all that "stuff" and now people who watch daytime TV while not contributing anything to society gets to benefit from your hard work? Tell me you're not for this. People who think that Marxism/Socialism is a great idea is all for everyone's wealth being redistributed back to them, but not when it's their wealth being redistributed to others. The system must work both ways for everyone to benefit and be happy with the results. Under Marxism/Socialism, everyone is a number. That's not how America sees people. We see them as people of virtue, value and valor. Is that how you see people?

In the end, which is the better message? Be dependent on the government or work for your own living? We both know which parties reflect these respective messages; they are undeniable. Start seeing people as valuable instead of numbers. People of lower income will remain there as long as they're repeatedly told that's all their worth.

You be positive, I'll be realistic.