Needs better editing


This could have been a very good short film, as there are several scenes that I think were successful in showing who Crane was, what he wanted to do as an artist, and the struggles he faced.

The problem is that there wasn't enough of that material to fill out the full hour-and-a-half running time. So there are long sequences of nothing particularly interesting happening, which hurts the pacing and makes parts of the film seem unfocused and a bit boring.

One example was the shots of him at the beginning of the film showing his head from front, rear, and sides (I assume this was done to indicate that James was playing an older version of the same character as Dave had played in an earlier scene, which had similarly shown the character from front, rear, and sides). This scene just seemed unduly long. Another example was the scene in which he appears to be writing a poem and is meditating on a word (sounded like naugahyde, but I don't remember exactly what the specific word was). This scene just seemed to go on endlessly and pointlessly.

I can see why many viewers haven't liked the film, and I wonder why Franco made the editing choices he did. I think if it were re-edited, it could be improved quite a bit.

reply

[deleted]

The two diptych-like shots in question were "broken" up and rotated and of long duration to visually convey he was suspended like a bridge and mentally breaking down

He broke down in a bad way at seventeen years of age, then broken down again in a very bad way at thirty-two years of age

Most of his life he was a broken man, and creatively and sexually suspended

Some of the shots when he was writing a poem were long in duration, with almost no camera motion, suspended, to show how mentally draining it was to conceive of the abstracted metaphors-symbols-associations he conceived, how much work it was, how mentally 'breaking' it was, how his mind slowed down to a motionless and suspended state, and, his thinking-mode was suspended by his ocean of other thoughts about his sexual orientation and the cruelty of his father and negative reception of his poems and his awareness that he would never be the writer he wanted to be and was trapped in obscurity, etc, the camera suspension and long duration let you inside his head and make you feel what he's feeling

I just watched this for the second time and it flew by, whereas the first time I watched this film I thought it was a 3-hour film because of those lengthy shots

reply