This film angered me


I caught Red Lights on TV the other night. I didn't really know what it was about but wasn't expecting much. As the premise initially unravelled, I thought it was a really interesting idea. It seemed to be an attempt at turning the paranormal thriller trope on its head. Sigourney Weaver was putting in what seemed to be an intelligent performance. The cast was impressive. It was cheesy but was different enough that I felt compelled to stay with it.

What a mistake that was. This film must take the biscuit for lazy writing. Before I get onto some my more trivial gripes, I'd first like to say that the final 'twist' was a complete betrayal of what the film was selling itself as. It was a total cop-out, probably conceived because the writers couldn't think of an intelligent way of wrapping up a difficult premise.. so opted for lame melodrama instead. Enough has been said about how rubbish it is so I won't needlessly strain my finger muscles repeating those points.

What really bothered me about the film - even before the ending - was how vague it was. So Margaret died of a heart attack. Was this a massive coincidence (given what happened to Silver's previous critic), the illicit work of Silver's goons, or did Tom do it by accident? And why did the original critic die of a heart attack anyway? Elsewhere, there was no explanation for some of the ostensibly supernatural things Silver did. How did he bend the spoon? Why didn't he think it was strange that lights and windows started smashing when he clocked Tom in the observation booth, considering that it wasn't him doing it? How did he start LEVITATING twenty feet in the air on the *beep* stage?? Did he have strings attached to himself? This wasn't explained at all. Did he believe that he had these powers or was he faking it all along? It seemed that given the watch stunt etc he probably knew.. But this doesn't explain some of his behaviour throughout the film. It's as if the writers just pulled these ideas out of their arses just for the sake of lazy - but entirely unexplained - gimmickry.

And what the hell was the final act? Tom gets jumped in the toilet by one of Silver's goons, who initially seems to be trying to strangle him to death. Notwithstanding the fact that it makes no sense that Silver would risk blighting his comeback by having one of his critics murdered in a really obvious way, the goon seems to give up. Instead, he just punches Tom a lot, and then leaves without finishing him off. What the hell was the point in this scene?? Then Tom confronts Silver in a face-off so melodramatic and OTT that it makes Skywalker vs. Vader look like a domestic between Garfield and Jon. "SILVERRRRRR!! SILVERRRRRR!!" Why weren't security intervening, anyway?

And what was the underlying message? Again, impossible to say. That rigorous methods of inquiry may seem all very well and clever but that scientists are just denying themselves?? That psychics do exist among all the fakes??? Seriously, what the hell was this steaming sh*t pile of a film trying to say?

reply

Yes, youve pretty much typed what I would have said. Impressive cast drew me in and so I stayed with it to the end. But it was a bunch of mis matched crap. Scenes that didnt go anywhere, didnt fit into a coherent whole. Rubbish!!

reply

Agree. Had the makings of a spectacular movie. And then. No.
Half way in I wondered why I had never heard of the movie. Once it finished, I knew why.

reply

[deleted]

Oh my god, STFU! It's a fecking movie!! Now, listen to me carefully...my advice to you is to calm down and watch a nice harmless comedy. Or go back on your meds.

reply

I was hoping I'd just missed some profound, underlying thread that tied the plot together in a semblance of coherence. But your post outlines many of the questions I had. The whole damn thing is full of holes and the "twist" at the end only made things worse. What a complete clusterf--k of a film.

reply

Silver had both Margaret & the other critic murdered.

He submitted to the testing after he had removed Margaret from the university because he knew he could fool the other yahoos that were working there. He probably killed the first critic for a similar reason. Perhaps they figured out he was a hoax?

All of Silver's tricks are just that: tricks. Excellent tricks, yes, but just tricks. Just because you didn't get every single trick explained doesn't mean it was "gimmickry". All of his tricks were fake. He can see, he has sneaky watches, murderous goons, etc. All of the things that makes a good magician look good. If he only did one interesting trick in the movie and it was explained, that just wouldn't make sense to us. He's supposed to be world renowned because he can put on a damn good show. If we didn't see him perform some amazing feats throughout the movie, we wouldn't believe that. His tickets sold for 2k a piece!!!

You can tell Silver doesn't have any actual powers because of his response to what Tom does at the end. Silver has now twice witnessed Tom put a whole theater into chaos using only his mind. He lets his act slip and demands to know how Tom does it. He even forgets to pretend he's blind by catching the coin.

The bathroom goon was just trying to knock Tom out. He was trying to cut off his air supply, but when Tom fought back, he had to punch him to knock him out. Too many deaths would look suspicious. But if Tom was out of the way just long enough for Silver to get his certification from the university and his final show done, it wouldn't matter. Silver could retire on top of the world.

The confrontation was melodramatic, but Tom was really emotional at that point. He realizes that if Silver would send a goon to silence him, he must be a fake. So he's pissed. He had hoped Silver was legit like him. But instead he realizes he's just a really smart bad guy. The security guy was going to intervene, but the agent stopped him.

The movie was about Tom's journey. He was special. He dedicated him life to finding someone else that was also special. His best bet was Silver. Tom got too involved, lost control of his powers, started unraveling, and eventually figured it out. It doesn't matter if he can find someone else like him. He's got to keep himself in control, keep his powers in control, and help those he cares about. He regretted not telling Margaret, but he does prove Silver to be a fraud for her, unplugs her son, makes up with his girlfriend, and embraces his unique talents.

reply

The thing with Margaret's son really threw me. Since when can people just waltz into hospitals and make life-or-death decisions for their deceased coworkers' children? That decision should have been made by whoever the son's closest relative was, or by the state if there were none. Medical power of attorney doesn't get passed on from one professor to their assistant like a lecture schedule at the university! Unless he just did it without authorization, in which case he'd better hope his psychic powers can foil a murder investigation when it turns out that no one approved shutting off the life support.

reply

I also found this on Netflix, and decided to check it out for the same reasons the OP did. And my take on the movie not showing/explaining how Silver did/does tricks he does is because until the end/Buckley's monologue, the film wants you to keep guessing if Silver does indeed have *some* powers.

reply

You can debate the vagaries of the story and plot holes etc, but there's a bigger picture here - and logical, rational people like the OP are right to be angered by this film. All the marketing and indeed 98% of the films run time is spent as a refreshing antidote to the glut of paranormal thrillers around - only to cop out in the final moments with a desperate grab for a 'twist ending' that sells out to the myth it debunked!

Sure we can say "its only a movie", but there are more important things at stake here - we could go so far as to say this is a debate we've been wrestling with ever since we became sentient and realised our lives do come to an end... And for almost as long, fraudsters and con artists have been bilking vulnerable people out of money to further their own ends. The list of exposed and busted psychics, paranormal fraudsters and faith healers is endless, yet still the exploitation of susceptible and vulnerable people continues worldwide.

Would it not have been a satisfying enough ending to see Silver's manipulative theatrics finally exposed in the moments just before he was about to be accredited by a flawed scientist?.... This film came so close to being an important counter voice in popular culture, and at the last minute handed an own-goal to the fraudsters.

Shame on the filmmakers.

reply

^^^^This. I also would have been more satisfied with the ending you proposed than the one we got...the "twist." Again, it could have been a pretty good film.

reply