So what?


Filmmakers get funding for their movies and all I have to see in the movie is the actress wearing a certain brand of clothes, the car she drives or holding a certain beverage in her hand......big deal.....maybe I like the way she dresses and I buy the clothes, so what now I get to enjoy wearing the fashionable clothes. Maybe I go out and test-drive the car and I like it, so I buy the car and enjoy driving in it. Maybe I try the drink and I love the drink......it has only made my life more enjoyable by enjoying the film, wearing the new clothes, enjoying the new car and enjoying a new drink.

reply

And being a sheep, being told what you would enjoy, using subliminal messages, lulling you into stupidity, into forcing you to buy it, and you think you made those choices yourself. Sure you did.

.;*We Live Inside A Dream*;.

reply

I still fail to see how that's "lulling you into stupidity".

Putting one product right into my face doesn't necessarily mean I'm sold. And lets be honest even if you are right, so what? Decisions like that have no greater impact on your life anyway.
I would rather focus on choices that actually matter, like what should I do with my life etc, rather then what brand of underwear should I wear. If someone is willing to make that decision for me, good, I'm glad.

reply

"If someone is willing to make that decision for me, good, I'm glad."

I'm really hoping that you're trolling me here.

reply

So what? So let's dance!





Signature!

reply

Look up the word "stupidity". Particularly its etymology. It's a very appropriate description of this no big deal state you speak of in your OP. I suspect you are trolling, but then again, I'm quite the optimistic.

Hey! Let's try it with the classics:

Go ahead, punk! Make my Met Life day!

You know how to whistle, don't you? You just put your Maybelline lips together and blow.

Is this a Macdonald and co. dagger that I see in my hand?

reply

Why don't you anti-capitalists just stand up and take the white robes and hoods off. You all had your coming out party in November of 2008, so quit with the tired, (insanely tired) "Sheep" references.

This Spurlock guy has zero cred. It's ridiculous the impact he had. The dude, ate at McDonalds, every day, three times a day, engorged himself on every single unhealthy option he could find, consumed 3 times the calories any normal person should, and then led us all to believe McDonalds and fast food is bad for us.

You want to talk about sheep? How is this not an insanely obvious anti-consumerism, anti-capitalism, anti-"American Dream" spiel?

You all decided you hated America after 20 years of Reagan and Bush and now we all have to periodically deal with your little tantrums. Sit down and shut up.

reply

"This Spurlock guy has zero cred. It's ridiculous the impact he had."

I agree.

reply

And yet McDonalds ended their Super Size option soon after release of the film and began putting more prominant nutritional information on their packaging and started offering healthier food alternatives, like fruit snacks in Happy Meals. Seems like a pretty big reaction to someone with "zero cred."

"Fortunately, Ah keep mah feathers numbered for just such an emergency!"

reply

"...[Spurlock] then led us all to believe McDonalds and fast food is bad for us." I don't know what grade and quantity of drugs you're using but you should probably ease off of it. McDonald's (and all fast food for that matter)-is- bad for you. I'm not saying I'm some sort of health-nut hippie, I'm not even close. McDonald's is unhealthy. It's a fact. I still eat McDonald's regardless. If you had paid attention to the movie at all the message was that, yes, that stuff WILL shorten your lifespan and make you ill but as long as you don't eat it all the damn time, you'll be alright.

A McChicken and fries a week won't hurt you too much. Thinking that only fast food is a "healthy choice" is foolish.

reply

Riiiiiiiight, but we really didn't need a movie to tell us that.

reply

by - Joshieboyucla on Wed Mar 30 2011 19:36:06
--------------------------------------------------------------
And being a sheep, being told what you would enjoy, using subliminal messages, lulling you into stupidity, into forcing you to buy it, and you think you made those choices yourself. Sure you did.

I cannot stand it when people think that being presented with an idea, product, etc. is the equivalent of having it "forced" onto them.

Josh, you need to have more confidence in your own mental faculties and willpower.

And quit trying to [hypocritically] FORCE others to stop selling what they believe in.


The Doctor is out. Far out.

reply

If someone sees a product in a movie and immediately wants to buy it they are rather weak-minded, and obviously can't think for themselves to begin with. I've seen plenty of movie stars driving a certain car, but that has never once made me think that I want that car too. I've seen dozen of bottles of coke and other sodas in movies, and never felt like I wanted one.

If you think that having a product presented to you in a movie will make you a "sheep", you must be rather insecure and possibly a little paranoid.


Stupidity is fun. Exhibition A - C; Bill & Ted's Exc. Adv.; Wayne's World; The IMdB Message Boards.

reply

I think the point is it's just counter-productive. Take James Bond films, 10-20 minutes are wasted of film time zooming into a logo. The car chases nowadays also are basically 15 minute car adverts too, making the car look cool from angle whilst making sure we are regularly informed of the brand and make of the car. We wouldn't tolerate it in any other art form, so why film? I can't think of anything worse than artists releasing songs that they have sold a line to Pepsi for instance.

Once upon a time you dressed so fine

reply

My entire drive to work is a huge car advertisement.

reply

Not that I would pay good money to see this in theaters--- I'll wait until this is on Netflix like Spurlock's previous doc--- but I don't worry about promotional placements whether in movies, TV, or stuck all over a NASCAR driver's uniform.

I will still only buy a used sedan I can afford, clothes probably at Walmart or Kohl's (okay, these 2 are evil too, I suppose)if there's a sale, and food products when there's a sale and I have coupons (okay, these are getting evil as well.)

In any case, I have never suffered from product envy, massive craving for salty/corn-syrupy snacks, or vehicles I can't afford or clothing I don't need. But I still require a vehicle, body coverings and some variety in my diet. I must choose from what has been made available to me by companies who manufacture these items. But product placements, per se, don't affect me.

I mean, really, if I see some actor eating Cheerios or Frosted Flakes, I won't be running out to get them even if they are on sale and with a coupon I can get a huge box for 50 cents. I LOATHE Cheerios or Frosted Flakes, but I wouldn't have known that if I hadn't tried them once. I know others really like them, and that's fine.

One doesn't know what one will like until one tries something. Continuing the cereal example, not many people are willing or have the facilities to grow and grind their own whole-grain cereals, for pete's sale, and maybe not everyone can stomach say, plain oatmeal, wheat, rice, or barley mush every freaking day.

So, they must buy what they will eat from those who do have the means to make them, and it's the customers' responsibility to learn and judge whether they are making wise/economical choices. This is, for better or worse, the way the world works.

If people are so weak-minded that they let these product placements affect their best judgment (or parents who cave in to their children's demands) or so unsavvy that they can't find ways to sample advertised products for a discount, then they get what they deserve.

reply

I will still only buy a used sedan I can afford, clothes probably at Walmart or Kohl's (okay, these 2 are evil too, I suppose)if there's a sale, and food products when there's a sale and I have coupons (okay, these are getting evil as well.)


And aren't most people like this?

If I was thirsty and I wanted a drink and I just walked past 50 Pepsi ads, I still wouldn't buy Pepsi because I don't like the way Pepsi tastes. If I absolutely needed something to drink and Pepsi was all they had, I might cave and buy one, but not because of ads.

People buy what they want to buy. I see plenty of ads every day for stupid stuff I'll never buy, but sometimes I see an ad for something that I would probably buy anyway.

Ads only remind you to buy things you already wanted to buy in the first place.

Don't try to cash in love, that check will always bounce.

reply

Exactly, why must it be implemented into art as well?

Once upon a time you dressed so fine

reply

@tsw453 "My entire drive to work is a huge car advertisement." Now that's funny!!!!

"Remember me, Mr. Schneider? Kenya, 1947."

reply

For me, excessive product placements and advertisements make our world seem so artificial. Like this movie seems to be pointing out, everything has a product attached to it now days. It's like nothing is sacred anymore... everything is connected with an attempt to get people to buy things.

And you say so what? Why is this bad? Like I pointed out, it makes things seem less sacred and more artificial. Also, it increases the overall greed of our society. With constant advertisements highlighting happy people using various products, people everywhere, whether they want admit it or not, say "hey look, those people are happy...I want to be happy too, so I'll buy that product and join the parade". Do they really NEED those things? Maybe sometimes... Do they NEED all those things? I think not.

Then we're all stuck forging our money to already rich cooperate fools who hoard their money amongst themselves, instead of possibly helping the less fortunate people around us who need it much more. Also, I believe it decreases our level of freedom. People, though still able to make their own decisions, are way too influenced by the status quo advertisements create. They've set everyone inline to either buy the "cool things" and fit in, or buy what you can and be somewhat of an outcast. And do all these THINGS really matter? Hell naw, yet advertisements make these THINGS seems as if they do.

As for the "Anti American" comment above, and that people like me "hate America". I love America, I'm just sad to see where it's ended up right now. And no, I will not "sit down and shut up" you jAck a$Z fool.

reply

don't ask me. i don't give a rat's ass about 'the commercialization of art'.
though to be honest that's also because my opinion of 'art' isn't very high: most of it is self-indulgent crap that whines about the more popular self-indulgent crap in the mass-media. no humor, no curiosity, much laziness, lots of sheep with terrible taste who worship the whole art-thingy hoping to get some second-hand glory

reply

I agree with the OP...I don't find product placement in entertainment a big issue. Another poster on this board makes a good point about product placement: it can help ground a scene in reality. And if it ever gets unbearably heavy-handed, a few flops at the box office will force a quick self-correction.

I also don't have a problem with the larger issue here, namely the connection between commerce and art. Sure, a lot of artistic abuses have been committed in the name of ensuring profits by pleasing the lowest common denominator, but business concerns have also forced artists to create for the public instead of just for themselves and their immediate aesthetic family members (e.g. critics, academics and elitist patrons). Take a look at what happened to the fine arts (especially poetry) after the first world war, when the "public" was no longer considered an important part of the audience. The navel-gazing to works-of-genius ratio skyrocketed.

Furthermore, I don't, in general, have a big problem with advertising. As long as consumer rights to fairness and truthfulness are being protected and it's being kept out of highly inappropriate places, I think advertising is a legitimate element of business and even a legitimate part of our culture, with a dynamic and mostly positive relationship to contemporary popular art.

As for product placement, or any advertising, that "brain-washes" consumers...well...as Forrest Gump's mother sort of used to say: gullible is as gullible does. At the end of the day, there's not much you can do to protect the congenitally foolish.

reply

I agree with the OP and I hate marketing with a passion.

Here's why this isn't effective marketing:

1. If I know and have seen the product elsewhere, then it will not affect me in a film.

For instance, I know all about Coke, ipods, and so on. So, if a Coke truck drives by in a movie it has no effect on my mind. I've tried the product and know if I want one or not. I've explored ipods and I don't think they're worth the price and seeing George Clooney with one will not change my mind.

2. If I do not know the product then I won't realize I'm seeing a commercial for one and it will go ingored.

So, I think companies are actually wasting their money on this strategy.


reply

Companies can waste as money as they want as far as I'm concerned.

If a character is having breakfast cereal in the movie (as you do when you wake up), then a product is needed to project that. If a company is willing to pay for the privilege to be that product, then fair enough. Companies don't mega profit on films like they used to.

It's just bad (and annoying) when it's in your face obvious, like in a Britney Spears or Kesha video clip.

reply

In my opinion filmmakers should not rely on product placement in movies for funding.
As with magazines with advertisements they will have a hard time being critical to the funding source and maintaining integrity as they balance that line.

But... I think this movie is about 30-40 years too late. Product placement in movies and magazines has been a problem for that long really.
What they should have focused attention on is the commercialization of the internet where people are shown advertisements constantly.

Neither of this is a problem for a trained mind, but our children are being bombarded with cra... ehhh... and they are unknowingly (to themselves and the parents) being molded into brand-dependent corporate machines.


Sheep or no sheep, big movies make enough money without product placement and companies pushing out their inferior products on the silver screen.
...a point well taken although 40 years too late! When will they scrutinize the internet (and IMDB) commercials? In 40 years time? :D

/J

reply

Product Placement is nothing but a redundant, filler criticism made up by Ivory Tower twits looking for something to complain about.


reply

If you guys want to see some blatant over-the-top advertising, look no further than this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I1kLfi-yFoA


"Listen, do you smell something?"
Ray Stanz-Ghostbusters

reply

[deleted]

Are you intentionally making atrocious "spelling and grammar" errors?

"Listen, do you smell something?"
Ray Stanz-Ghostbusters

reply

[deleted]

No one has mentioned the effect this has on children growing up in a society filled with brands.

Or the idea that these sorts of corporate endorsements can influence the movie in a significant way. If a big corporation has enough clout they can require certain things to be done to the story.

This movie was intended to spark conversation and provoke people to think.

What's most unsettling to me is that most people seem to think they're impervious from the influence of advertising.

reply

[deleted]

michaelflatley, though the way you write irritates the hell out of me, what you said in your first post makes perfect sense. I think we often don't know how influenced we are by advertising or how insidious its effects can be. People may think they're making a conscious choice, but who knows how much of an effect subliminal advertising really has? Whatever the science behind it, companies know product placement works or they wouldn't bother doing it in the first place - there are films that they won't allow their products to appear in because they think it will create a negative association rather than the positive one they want.

reply