MovieChat Forums > Oslo, 31. august (2011) Discussion > Louis Malle's Le Feu Follet

Louis Malle's Le Feu Follet


Malle made his film in 1963 based on the same novel as the one this film was adapted from. It's very similar in content to this film although Malle's character is a recovered alcoholic and moves within a more monied and staid Parisian middle class than Anders's in Oslo.

Of the two I preferred this film as I found Anders more relatable and 'Oslo, August 31st' a more emotional film than Malle's, which seemed more intellectually concerned with the despair in disconnection.

If anyone else has seen both I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the films and if you preferred one to the other.

Fatima had a fetish for a wiggle in her scoot

reply

I still prefer Malle's The Fire Within, which I think is his best movie. It helps that Malle was going through something similar prior to making it.

Oslo, 31 August is great as well, but it has a weaker 1st half with a great 2nd half ( that is more comparable to The Fire Within, in that it focuses more on Anders's disconnection and existential ennui ) . However, I prefer Oslo's somewhat open-ended ending, showing that life still goes on , to Malle's more pessimistic's ending. But in a way, Oslo's ending was even more hopeless and bleak , leaving you with a sense of emptiness . I think the last shots illustrate and tie Anders's condition to the modern world , and how he perceives it. Great ending.


The Fire Within: 10/10
Oslo, 31 August: 8,5/10

reply

Thanks for the detailed reply.

in a way, Oslo's ending was even more hopeless and bleak , leaving you with a sense of emptiness . I think the last shots illustrate and tie Anders's condition to the modern world , and how he perceives it. Great ending.
I found the lot of the character in Oslo more upsetting because I felt those aorund him were trying to reach him or demonstrate the sufferings they too experienced. In La Feu Follet I didn't like any of the supporting characters. The best sense I have of the distinction between the two is that I felt tearful at the end of Oslo whereas I felt separate from the man's plight in LFF.

Both films get an 8/10 from me. Lift to the Scaffold is my favourite Malle closely followed by Au Revoir Les Enfants, thus far.
Fatima had a fetish for a wiggle in her scoot

reply

My favorite sequence in Oslo was the party scene , it shows Anders's somewhat futile attempt to connect with his friends and the others around him ( which brings him no happiness, and we know what happens next)

Both films get an 8/10 from me. Lift to the Scaffold is my favourite Malle closely followed by Au Revoir Les Enfants, thus far.


How about My dinner with Andre? Have you seen it?

reply

I haven't seen My Dinner With Andre. Yet.

Fatima had a fetish for a wiggle in her scoot

reply

[deleted]

My favourite scene is when anders is sitting on his own in the cafe and hears peoples conversations and imagines what a blonde womans life would look like. As well as showing how detached he feels from society it also suggests he has a kind of sixth sense. It was filmed in a subtle but surreal way almost Brunel like.

reply

Thanks for your post ell1981; as it's been a while since I saw Oslo I don't recall the scene you recollect. I'm not a big fan of Bunuel or his surreal style and I wasn't reminded of his film style whilst watching Oslo.

I give my respect to those who have earned it; to everyone else, I'm civil.

reply

For some reason, Oslo... made the estrangement and the dead end the protagonist was facing, a bit more palpable and understandable. In Le Feu Follet, I sort of kept wondering as to what the heck was the matter with the suicidal dude, anyways, while here I never really thought to question it. Maybe it had got something to do with the drug element always looming low on the horizon, rendering the situation more urgent and the goddamn ennui less abstract. On the other hand though I think Malle's film was perhaps a tad more crisply and evocatively shot; in all, they're both very good movies.



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

Oslo... made the estrangement and the dead end the protagonist was facing, a bit more palpable and understandable. In Le Feu Follet, I sort of kept wondering as to what the heck was the matter with the suicidal dude, anyways
Yes. I felt Oslo was a more watery film emotionally whereas LFF was dry and intellectual. To borrow your phrase the ennui in LFF seemed abstract.

I agree both are good films.
I give my respect to those who have earned it; to everyone else, I'm civil.

reply