Is it just me or is it wrong for them to do a sequel without The Evil Queen? What's the use with watching a Snow White movie without The Evil Queen. Maybe they could find some way of bringing her back or she could cameo. How's it gonna work?
shareAs I said in an earlier thread (marked Story Board, although no one cared ), I reckon William should become the bad influence. Not purposely, it's his obsessing with Snow White that means that jealously take over.
shareI wouldn't like any attempt to make William the bad guy. As for who could fill that role, it wouldn't be that hard to do IMO.
"A true archer doesn't even need a bow or an arrow."
SWATH doesn't need a sequel, it needs a remake.
shareHow right you are Tiger. It could have been and should have so much more than what it was. A decent director, a decent actress in the lead role and most of all...a coherent script that hit all the power points of the original story. I remember how powerful the Huntsman was in 'The 10th Kingdom'. I didn't think much of the series but he was a powerful presence in it.
_____________
I am the Queen of Snark, TStopped said so.
Easy, just make KS the bad Queen and have a new 'fairest of them all' rise up against her.
She killed the Ravenna, which could likely taint her purity, allowing for corruption to start forming inside her heart (if you want an explanation for why she could turn bad).
Then she slowly gets worse, mistreating her people and eventually executing those that try to rally against her.
Huntsman turns up and kicks her ass. After closing her mouth.
Hire an ugly, but mediocre, actress to play KS's foil.. the twist is the mirror does a mind-fark and says 'in the land there's a fair actress'.
KS concedes...movie over after first minute.
I may watch!!!
"Peace and love"