How can a woman in charge of Cleo not be able to keep her own husband?
I felt the two-part series was true to what Ita wrote in her Early Edition - Mr First Forty Years (See Amazon: http://amzn.to/hV8a98 ) which I read years and years ago. The series told us what she wanted us to know.
But reviewer Emily Dunn says that a "viewer well versed in media gossip would expect" sex scenes between other characters other than those shown. She also says the "portrayal of both Buttrose and Packer is so rose-tinted."
For her full review: http://www.theage.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/paper-giants-the-b irth-of-cleo-monday-april-18-20110417-1dj61.html
Makes one think.
But I don't think it matters if the relationship is rose-tinted or not, what I found most interesting and truthful was a woman whose own personal life was falling apart (ie husband left her) while she is in charge of a magazine which claimed to be an authority on how to teach other women how to run their lives. i.e.When the editor of Cleo can't get her own life together, which magazine does she turn to?
This series will probably spawn other series or movies of main characters in charge of magazines or shows which purport to teach readers how to run their lives, while their own lives are falling apart.
A biop of Oprah anyone?