Boll needs too give up!

And you need to learn that "to" and "too" aren't interchangeable if you want people to take your criticism of film seriously. Throwing an apostrophe in at appropriate points wouldn't go amiss either.
You may decide based on 10 seconds that you don't want to see it, but others have seen Darfur and know he can actually handle serious subject matters well - certainly an order of magnitude better than his game movies.

Auschwitz (2011)

Description:

A Holocaust exploitation movie. A movie with no commentary, no human psychology, no plot, no point, no redeeming values, and no happy ending. Just nearly two hours of gory, relentless, Hostel-type violence against ordinary people. It's absolutely disgusting. Uwe Boll is using the Holocaust as an argument to show the most gruesome things on the screen... and for no reason aside from the "just for the hell of it" addage. I'm not saying the brutality of World War II shouldn't be shown a reminder of just how brutal the war was. The brutality was shown in other movies ('Schindlers List', 'The Pianist', etc.) But there's a difference between those type of movies and violent exploitation filth which Uwe Boll sees either as sensationalism, a sick joke, or as a comment on blood and violence in our society, or a combination of all three which he uses in all of his movies. People like Uwe Boll who cannot understand the difference between it is really damaged in the head.

Avoid at all costs.

i watched gullivers travels thinking omg this uwe boll movie sucks.. then i was like WHAT!!! this is a hollywood blockbuster. its been filmed on EYETOY