Horrible ending


The initial premise was interesting and the initial chemistry between Scott and Westfeldt was almost believable, with a charming supporting cast... I bought the first part of the movie. Though the plot arc wasn't developed in the most realistic way, it's an interesting thought experiment.

At the end, the dialogue and chemistry really tanked. Something about the final pacing was off- Jason's change of heart was totally forced- the most pivotal exposition indicating to is that he intimates he had a "really" dirty dream about her to his sleezy friend at a bar?

The final scenes between Joe, Julie, and Jason were ridiculously forced. After a couple hours of watching other married couples fighting and a main character who chose physical attraction over his "best friend" for the first two years of their son's life, I mostly just feel sad. Don't think that was the point...

reply

Yeah for the first half of the film I was sure they weren't going to take the easy way out Especially as Jason continued to e so resolute in his belief that he didn't lie Julie in THAT way.

But as the story played out and it became clear that Julie was falling in love with the idea of a more traditional family, I gave in to the eventual ending.

I don't hate that they went that route, I just wish it got there a bit more convincingly.

reply

They had me up until the last few minutes ... When Jason proclaims that he wants to *beep* the sh*t" out of Julie, I cringed. There was just something so off in that moment. I cannot explain it.

reply

Easy - coz Adam Scott, charming as he is, does not convince as being 'sexy' and even more so when he's playing y being aggressively sexy.

Buy perhaps that's just my personal taste coming through.

reply

It's just about the worst ending possible they could have picked. When Jason was driving back to her place, I thought he was going to get in a car accident or something.

Honestly, why should I want these two people to get together? Jason is a shallow, yuppy, pretentious douchebag who uses women as sexual objects and brags about to his friends (male and female) behind the woman's back. Oh yeah, I wanted to punch him in the face every time he called Julie "doll." Julie wasn't much better, but it did seem she started to mature through the film, even though a seemingly nice guy got hurt that we never heard from again.

The dialogue all felt so forced, like she was trying to make this a "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang" style film and it just didn't work. Adam Scott is best playing a down-to-earth straight man (IE...Ben Wyatt) and the leads really didn't work.

It's also sad that they had so many funny people in a strong supporting cast that were reduced to these horrible, miserable people for 90% of the movie.

If this is what's supposed to pass for "feminist" comedy or whatever, count me out. I was on the fence until the ending but by God was that ever horrible.

reply

Why label it "feminist?"


PLOT HOLE: Aspect of a film that is misunderstood, ignored, or missed while using your smart phone.

reply

Words taken out of my mouth. I thought it was sufficient when Jason said he'd rather die than watch the love of his life die because he finally see Julie that way. A little corny maybe but the begging was just uh uh. Too much.

Perhaps it was to establish Julie's character as being truly moved on from the whole fiasco, that she needed more convincing Jason had a change of heart. Could have been approached a lot better than how they chose to end it

reply

[deleted]

I'm so glad people feel this same way. I had the movie rated pretty high, right up until the final 5 minutes or so. I wasn't convinced Jason had changed at all. I felt that everyone convinced him Julie was what he wanted, but that he would change his mind in a couple weeks after the ending of the movie took place. The dialogue, as everyone else said, was terrible in their final conversation together. It's too bad.

reply

[deleted]

Same here. What a horribly crass thing to say to "the love of your life".

reply

When Jason proclaims that he wants to *beep* the sh*t" out of Julie, I cringed. There was just something so off in that moment. I cannot explain it.


I totally agree. In fact, they both said the line so it was doubly cringe-worthy.

reply

yeah the ending was crappy cos it was rushed, the dialouge was rubbish and as soon as they said he wanted to *beep* the *beep* out of her and they started that was it, it just ended... what an ending!





Ashmi any question

reply

Agreed. The ending was totally forced. It happened all of the sudden like it's Jule's dream or something.

reply

Actually, having read all the comments, I completely disagree. The rush and hurriedness at the end was parallel with the sense of desperate passion which you suddenly feel when you realise that you are actually in love with someone who you are not with.The urgency to act on it is overwhelming. Having felt the same myself, I thought it thoroughly believable. As a woman, I also grasp the importance of the vulgarity and passion with which you want to act on that desire. Some people like slow steady love, in the real world it is more chaotic and passionate when you realise you cannot spend another moment without telling or showing them how you feel.I also like the fact that actors are not typecast and get to show their diversity by being more serious. It is very realistic in many respects. Not schmaltzy and too sentimental.
I enjoy it thoroughly.

reply

I agree with the realization & need to tell the person you aren't with that you love them but damn this dialogue was bad. When Harry Met Sally did it so much better. Harry didn't tell Sally he wanted to bleep the bleep out of her, he said it so much better. "I came here tonight bc when you want to spend the rest of your life with someone, you want the rest of your life to start as soon as possible." That's way more romantic & what a woman wants to hear over "I will bleep the bleep out of you to show you how much I love you." Um what!!!?

reply

I completely agree with Vanessa. I loved the ending, it didn't seem forced at all. He thought he wanted one thing and over time realised that he wanted something else, what's not believable about that?

The dialogue at the end wasn't any worse than the rest of the film. He wanted to *beep* her brains out because he was proving to her that he wasn't compromising love and lust for an easy life, that he was attracted to her. It also contrasted with the conception scene. It was acted pretty decently and wasn't the easiest of scenes to make believable.

I know that they sort of went for a schmaltzy ending but who's to say that such a thing doesn't happen in the real world? Friendships often evolve into romance, so why not theirs?

At least they didn't flash forward a year and showed them with another baby or anything, now that would have been cheesy. It wasn't tied up in a neat little bow, would their relationship survive this change into romance? It's up to us to make that assumption, who knows?

reply

It's not believable because he insisted that he was not physically attracted to her. How the hell can you have a romantic relationship with someone that you are not physically attracted to? You cannot.

reply

'It's not believable because he insisted that he was not physically attracted to her.'

Ummm did you watch the whole film? He didn't think he was physically attracted to her then his feelings changed. Haven't you experienced this in real life? Feeling one way about a person then that changing over time. Relationships wouldn't break up as often if attraction was a static thing.

reply

I'm 100% with you, Debbie. I thought the ending was great and the urgency and passion conveyed was completely believable for me. The types of relationships presented in the film, Julie and Jason in particular, brought into question how having a child affects an adult relationship. I liked how comparisons were made between relationships that began lustily end ended in bitter hatred for each other with a kid and relationships that began platonically, children were had platonically and in the end when they decide to be romantic a foundation is already set. This type of thought provoking material is what I most enjoyed about the film and I thought the ending was completely necessary to fully showcase that comparison.

Also, as far as Jason's line goes, I've found that in reality people DO say things like that naturally, usually out of a heated passion. I think it fell in line with the character and lent itself to the abruptness of the moment. Adam Scott and Jennifer Westfeldt did a great job and the moment felt very real to me.

reply

It totally worked for me! Wasn't attracted to my male best friend at all in that way! *beep* happens, now we've been together 8 years! I kind of enjoyed that it had parallels with my own story. Minus the kid part!

reply

I think tnat actually he was attracted to her all long, or at least for a good few years. His love and passion for her just grew. Its just that he was a bit of an idiot and hadnt been able to see it up until that point!
He'd told himself jools was just a friend and had convinced himself so well that he didnt realise he actually was in love with her. The speech he made on tneir skiing holiday said it all! He was just v immature in the begininng and based his attraction purely on the physical.
Having watched quite a few rubbish romcoms with ridiculous scenarios where the couple have a baby but for whatever reason are not together... This was definitley one of the better more believable ones i thought!

I actually loved the ending.... I thought it was passionate and sexy! Slightly shocking, but he had to really comvince her that he DID fancy her- having previously said he didnt- as well as loving her in every way. Loved it 😄

reply

Failed in the same way THIS IS 40 did, though FRIENDS was overall better...they both seek to depict marriage, divorce and raising children in a realistic manner, then somehow tack on the traditional Hollywood ending.

The seems like the director's pet project, much like 40 was Apatow's, so I don't believe studio intervention played much of a role. It's just hard to buy what a movie is selling if the movie doesn't even believe itself.

reply

I think his absurdly rigid attraction standard that made him not see his perfectly gorgeous bff as attractive in the first place was more unrealistic than how it ended. What guy, who actually wants to get married to a woman, passes up on their best friend who they love and have every value in common with and is perfectly thin and pretty, for the perfect pair of boobs? That seems so much more ridiculous than a guy realizing finally that his bff is the love of his life. The character was too educated for that crazy level of shallowness to be believable... and I guess it didn't help that such a character was played by the ever-decent-seeming Adam Scott. I really did enjoy the film very much though. I've been binging on Netflix movies lately and this was definitely one of the better ones.


PLOT HOLE: Aspect of a film that is misunderstood, ignored, or missed while using your smart phone.

reply

I'm sorry, but I completely disagree. The ending to this film was absolutely necessary to demonstrate the ongoing themes and stories which were being told. The story was about the effects kids have on relationships and how those different dynamics shift with time. Whereas most of the other relationships were based on sex and passion, Julie and Jason's was based on friendship which is why it was necessary that they get together in the end.

Also, I don't think any of the scenes were forced, I think some of them had an awkwardness that was necessary to make them believable, but that was part of the story/character profiles. Also, I adore Jennifer and really think she delivered an outstanding performance.

reply

I agree that the theme was kids and marriage, but they were painted in painfully real terms in every instance, other than the final scene. It's obviously a personal opinion, but I "believed" every decision by every character until 1) Adam Scott's character "realized" he was in love with his best friend (a movie cliche appearing in a movie that attempts to buck cliches) and 2) When Jennifer Westfeldt's character accepted him after about 5 minutes of consideration.

I agree some scenes were extremely awkward, but that was intentional. Those awkward scenes have nothing to do with how the very unnatural ending played out.

I had never heard of Jennifer Westfeldt but I agree she writes pretty good dialogue and gave a great performance.

reply

I completely disagree as well. I hated the first part, as a matter of fact, I was sure at that point I would hate the whole movie; it looked like one of these Apatow comedies, idiotic and vulgar. I felt as if I was watching a sitcom and I was getting bored. On top of that, half of the cast was made of actors I don't like.

But then, after they got the child, the story gradually got deeper and somehow more heartfelt, culminating with two powerful scenes: the dinner in the cabin, where they all gather for the last time and their exchange gets more and more tense, and then the intimate dinner that ends in tears. These were -really- good scenes. They completely changed my perspective on the film. The beginning wasn't setting the tone, like I thought, it was only a necessary preamble for the later events.

As for the ending, I loved it, it was original and spot-on. How many movies end just when the characters are going to have sex? It was the only thing missing in their upside-down relationship to be complete at that point: the passionate sex. They already had the kid and everything else that normal movies, describing linear relationships, end with.

__________________________
1up-games.com Last watched: imdb.to/K4tvL9

reply

Don't know if you've actually seen any or just judge them all for their previews, but Apatow movies pretty much ALWAYS get more profound. That's kind of his signature way of storytelling: Absurdly raunchy at the start, but showcases the emotional core of his leads by the end.


PLOT HOLE: Aspect of a film that is misunderstood, ignored, or missed while using your smart phone.

reply

I have to disagree. I'm kind of in the same situation as these two (minus the baby).

Some of you are ignorant to lifelong friendships. As I've stated in a different topic I've known my fiancé for more than ten years. And that's the way we talk to each other and I find it sweet when she says she wants to "f the s outta me".

When you've had a great friend for so long you just sorta be your absolute real person you are in front of them. You speak the words you are thinking instead of trying to think up some douchey Hollywood romantic saying. These two have always talked casually about everything and I bet it was romantic for her when he said "lemme prove that I love you by f'ing the s out of you". I said "you make me so horny I'm gonna shoot you to the moon" (with my semen) when we finally got together. And she was like awwww your so sweet (and it turned her on and made the sex better).

So maybe you guys should reconsider their actual previous relationship before you judge.

I'm so glad it didn't end with some cheesy Hollywood dialogue. It felt real. At least to me who is in a similar situation.

reply

Add me to those who think the last 5 or so minutes was awful. They had a good story going up until the last scene(s) when the inappropriate language was such a turnoff. The character couldn't do better than that?

Julie had, when she wanted to tell Jason how she felt, had a reservation at a restaurant, and when it's Jason's turn, that's what he did? Completely unimpressive rookie maneuver for a 40-year old guy.

reply

I agree with those who felt most of this movie was pretty good, got you hooked in, and all the actors did a great job, but the last few mins were just awful.

Instead of just stating the obvious which was they were both behaving like single parents instead of best friends or even family, he comes at her with the I want to *beep* the $%%^ out of you line. Had they made him say I want to spend the rest of my life with you etc.. It would have capped off a very good movie, possibly a B+. But that ending brought this movie down to a C-.


Jesus would support Universal Health Care

reply

I wasn't crazy about the vulgar line that he says to her at the end. It felt a bit off.

HOWEVER, I think it was in keep with their personalities, their previous relationship and addresses the insecurities she felt since he always said he wasn't attracted to her. I think hey could've gone with something similar but not as er….abrasive?

reply