What a shame


I feel so bad for the actors who did their best with this horrible script and direction that must have been emailed onto the set. How someone can take a great topic, perfect for motion pictures and purposely not do anything to make it exciting. This is on par with a mediocre student film. I've never seen a picture with so many uninteresting and meaningless montage sequences. For some crazy reason they never go into what makes a champion racer, never even going into explaining the 'christmas tree'. I'm so disappointed.

reply

Unless someone expected a nature film about mongooses and snakes, they would already know what this film is about and therefore, what a Christmas tree is. Plus, it's pretty hard to explain what makes a champion racer when the racers themselves don't even claim to know. If they say anything it will likely contain the word "luck."
KS

reply

Movies are made for public consumption. Not everyone who sees this film will understand the intricacies of Top Fuel Eliminator racing. These elements must be explained to the audience in order to achieve maximum tension filled moments. All champions know why they are the best. They don't attribute it all to 'luck'. These are important elements of drama.

reply

A movie that was in 20 theaters for 3 months is not aiming for public consumption. It is aimed at the fans. Fans know what the movie will be about and how drag racing works (Christmas trees, burnouts, etc.). Even in the 60's and 70's, drag racing was on TV. Contrast this with Formula One in the same era which showed only one race a year (usually Monaco) and that's why the movie Rush explained things "to the public" a lot more than S&M did.

If the movie didn't go into "what makes a champion" to your satisfaction, I think that Ed Donovan explained it best to Tom when he said that the reason he felt Don was the best (champion material) was because he raced from the heart. Tom was the promoter of the two and Don was the racer. Even when they drove identical equipment, Don won more races likely due to better reaction time at the green light. That's usually where races are won and lost. Don even chided Tom for not having his head in the game. It finally took a tragic event in Tom's life for him to finally win the big one over his arch rival. I hope that he never thought that Don lost on purpose, even if that's what really happened.

And while I didn't say that anyone attributes winning all to luck (read my post again), it certainly can have a place in the end results.
KS

reply

Wrong.

reply

Whatever.

reply