MovieChat Forums > Office Christmas Party (2016) Discussion > Is this Jennifer Aniston's annual "I got...

Is this Jennifer Aniston's annual "I got so totally naked" movie?


It's been a while since the last time she made the rounds talking about how completely naked she got for her latest movie (Horrible Bosses, Wanderlust, We're the Millers) - looks like this is a good candidate...


--
Philo's Law: To learn from your mistakes, you have to realize you're making mistakes.

reply

Looks like it will not be that.Didn't you watch the trailer ?

reply

I hadn't at the time - it was mostly just a silly joke on my part about Ms. Aniston's style of trying to create buzz for her movies.


--
Philo's Law: To learn from your mistakes, you have to realize you're making mistakes.

reply

she may get naked in films, but you never see her nude so it doesnt count
why can G-rated movies have topless men, but the second a women sheds her upper garments, its almost straight to R rate

reply

why can G-rated movies have topless men, but the second a women sheds her upper garments, its almost straight to R rate


Sexism. Something men and women can agree on needs to come to an end ;)



reply

why can G-rated movies have topless men, but the second a women sheds her upper garments, its almost straight to R rate


Because the female body is an immortal, sensual, piece of art, while the male body is lumpy, hairy, and should never be seen by the light of day. Except maybe Channing Tatum.

reply

Because they sexualize females in film, the tribal women in films you saw in school weren't sexualized, it was just their standard of living... but if you want the nudity rating to change, then you'd have to first have a talk with the rest of the male gender and suggest they stop heavily sexualizing women like porn-candy... and targeting the 18-49 male audience as priority (just so they can buy a yacht). I'm sorry but I gather you enjoy that at the very least yourself, no? It would be nice if we could stop objectifying humans, IMO. I don't care if it's male sexuality exposure equaling females at this point, just silly and takes advantage of human expression (natural).

reply

I don't care if it's male sexuality exposure equaling females at this point


Equaling , you are kidding , since when is there any female genital nudity in any main stream film or TV. Male genital nudity is in loads of films and TV sometimes in graphic close up.
Any females that are said to be naked are fully covered in cozy merkins , biggest Hollyweird double standard ever.

Male and females are objectified , I not sure how you would ever stop either.
It just has to be equal.

reply

trance

reply

Yes its virtually the only film with full female nudity.

reply

I would prefer to not be traumatized with sausage in my movies. Especially if Ms Anniston is displaying the goods.

reply

Feminazi fail.

reply

Shut up.

I like my phone like my dreams... dead.

reply

Finding someone attractive is not "objectifying" them. Objectifying a person means thinking of them as nothing more than a thing to have sex with. Having no concern for intelligence or emotions or aspirations - just that they will provide you with sexual gratification.

Human relationships are multi-dimensional - they are based on interpersonal relationships, and emotions, and experiences, and physical attraction. Early in a relationship (like when it's just getting started) there's a lot less to connect with - some shared banter, a sense of personality from a little talk, and... physical attraction. When all that's happened is that you've seen the person, there's nothing else to go on.

Acting as though finding someone physically attractive is "objectifying" them shows a massive failure of understanding how human relationships work, and a very simplistic worldview.

And I'm sure if you were to sign up for an online dating service, you would look for one that didn't allow profile pictures, because you want to evaluate a potential partner based solely on their personality and writing, right?


--
Philo's Law: To learn from your mistakes, you have to realize you're making mistakes.

reply

Humans are animals and will always objectify each other. In fact, studies have shown that women objectify other women even more than men do, so you've got some work to do on your catty sisters before you get to the guys. In my experience, changing a base instinct (which sex is) is an exercise in futility, so you might want to move onto changing minds for issues that deal with higher thinking.

reply

studies have shown that women objectify other women even more than men do


I *knew* they all had that fantasy!


--
Philo's Law: To learn from your mistakes, you have to realize you're making mistakes.

reply

We need more unicorn sexualization.

(Thank you Deadpool!)

😂

reply

Yes. THAT (bab7410).

Also don't get the PO's line about topless men.
they have no boobs, so why would having peck or being fit move needle on a rating?
that line makes no sense.

But actresses will continue to be sexualized so long as males (for most part) run the film industry. Period.

reply

It would be nice if we actually saw her naked, aside from the paparazzi shot of her bathing topless in her back yard ages ago. Show them titties already.

reply

aaand point made...

reply

Actually, while nice looking for a chick coming up on 50, no one is beating any doors down to see her naked. She should have done it during the Rachel Green years - when the world did want to see her naked.

reply

Are you confusing Olivia Munn with Hope Solo?


I couldn't believe when I read his filmography that he played a toilet (no joke) in According to Jim

reply

I clicked and all I got was this lousy sandwich. Lol

reply

[deleted]

Office Christmas Party Review



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68l-LAyuEHY

reply

She is fully clothed through out the movie...

To each their own

reply