Seriously?



How in the hell did they get Woody Harrelson to present this old collection of arguments, theories and 2000-era-based conclusions?

Did they pay him the WHOLE half a million dollar budget?

If it weren't for Woody, this documentary would be just another clip on youtube.

Hey, go easy.. I do actually suffer with Dyslexia.

reply

The thing that is different here is that Woody takes part in it and for most people that gives credibility. The problem with these types of documentaries is that they are conspiracy-theories for most people, even for most academics that should know better.

I can show this to my "well educated" friends and they will watch it, simply because Woody is in it. It's sad, but true.

Zeitgeist ruined the focus on these issues with all their conspiracy-nonsense. ZG took it way to far and therefor most people don't take this stuff seriously. Ethos took it down to earth again and cut out 99% of the crap from ZG. I wish this one was made first.





The most dangerous bomb is the F-bomb and it requires censorship! All other bombs air live on CNN.

reply

If an argument is valid, it doesn't matter if it's old. And theories aren't necessarily wrong or bad.

reply