MovieChat Forums > Detention (2012) Discussion > I think they confused the '80's and the ...

I think they confused the '80's and the '90's ....


Not with the music so much, but some of the fashion/movies. The jumping up and down dancing ... animal prints ... leggings under a short skirt. '80's. Those flourescent sunglasses? EIGHTIES. They gave them out in Happy Meals in the late '80's. I know, I had a couple pairs. Roadhouse came out in the '80's. Steven Seagal was already big in the '80's. The Breakfast Club is pretty much the quintessential '80's high school movie.

So anyways, not super sure where they were going with that. I graduated from high school in 98, so I remember the '90's pretty well.


They're coming to get you, Barbara!

reply

Well 1992 was a year that was slowly getting away from the 80's, but SLOWLY. So some of the fashion was spot on. And the director, Joseph Kahn, stated the movie references were meant to be 80% 90's and 20% 80's.

reply

I don't know - crunchy hair and flourescents were already out by 92, at least where I lived. Maybe being in California has something to do with it. I know when I lived in New Mexico for a while I was surprised that fashion was around 5 years "behind."

They're coming to get you, Barbara!

reply

I would think during those years clothes and culture progressed more slowly, not as rapid as today. Like in the 80s how a song would be extremely popular for like 3 years straight.

reply

Nothing like that ever happened. No song would be popular for 'like 3 years straight'. You are incorrect. Fail.

reply

I agree, it might've been dependent on where you live. For example, some things that are "in" in the East coast aren't necessarily in the West coast and vice versa.

reply

I find it laughable that you think you can remember the exact year that "crunchy hair and flourescents" went out of style 20 years ago. Are you serious? The "past" portion of the movie took place in 1992, that isn't very far off from the 80's. The styles didn't just disapear overnight. They were just toned down from the 80's. Both In Living Color and Married with Children were on during this early 90's time period, and both had young girls in "crunchy hair and flourescent" cloths. So no, these styles were not gone at the point. You are just remembering it wrong. Although I do agree those styles were on their way out, you can't fault the accuracy of the styles in this movie.

reply

**flipping through my junior high yearbook** Oh, okay. You're right. I'm remembering it wrong. Cameras hadn't been invented for personal use yet, I guess.

:/

They're coming to get you, Barbara!

reply

"Road House" from 1989 and "Under Siege" from 1992 are mentioned. 89 and 92 are very late 80's.

reply

You might be talking about the 90s in general, but you've got to remember that most of the references were specific to 1992. When most people think of the 90s, they identify with the Gen X counter-culture. Grunge exploded in 1992 and was pretty much what did away with neon green zebra striped spandex and a $0.35 bright pink fanny pack. Grunge fashion wasn't really assimilated into popular culture until 94ish when it became post-grunge, and behind that hiphop became much more popular and influenced the whole nu-metal image that is so synonymous with the mid to late 90's. 1992, fashion and culture-wise, was very much 80's-ish. Go watch sitcoms like Blossom, Saved by the Bell, 90210, and other pop-culture oriented shows that bled over into the early 90s. Hell, Poison was at the top of the charts in 92. And Roadhouse never made much of a splash until it hit home video, which back then took forever. Though the movie was made/released in 89, its popularity falls squarely within the 90s as well as Swayze's post-Dirty Dancing popularity.

As a comparison, go take a look at what was popular in 80, 81, 82 and you'll find it much more becoming with the stereotypical 70s image than the sexually ambiguous synth driven seizure inducing fashion associated with much of the 80s.

You pseudo-nostalgic conceptualists tend to oversimplify cultural phenomenons of decades by putting a beginning and end date at the stroke of midnight on January 1st, 19xx.

reply

Great post, pjrichardson!

You know, I've been lucky. Somebody up there likes me.
Somebody down here, too.

reply

Well, those were the clothes I was wearing around 92, so it's not too far off.

reply

Think about it for a minute.

The era typically referred to as the 60's actually culturally took place from 1965 to 1975. The 70's from 1975 to 1985 and the 80's from 1985 to 1995-ish. But it's a mouth full to explain with that much elaboration. So people just say the 60's. When you can find an album, a film, and a TV show from 1973 that looks like it could have been made in 1966. The culture doesn't just change magically because a number changed it doesn't work like that. I think they did a fine job of capturing the 90's.

reply

I've always noticed that with decades you really don't see the decade's "pop culture" that is referred to in that specific decade taking off until about the fourth year in. For example, my parents, who grew up in the 60s, can remember that the first few years of the 60s were still like the 50s. In fact, when you even think about the 50s, you usually think about '57, '58, and '59. That style, the music, cruising, all bled into the early 1960s. Take American Graffiti for example, it's set in '62, but it still feels very much like the 50s. Interestingly enough, this movie is showing how '92 was still very 80s which makes my point. But anyways, the 60s didn't really take off until about '64. That's when you start seeing the things that made the decade. Same with the 70s. Watch any movies pre-74 and it still looks pretty 60s. When it comes to the 80s, the 80s definitely took off in '84. Up until '83, movies and styles were still pretty 70s looking. (One rule I've had is that if you see a lot of orange, it's still 70s fashion and decor). By 1984, though, the 80s had pretty much completely taken off and the 70s were gone. Now, with the 90s, I'd say that true "90s" culture and style started to come around in '93, but really started in '94 and '95. I was actually born in '92 so I obviously don't remember that year specifically. My earliest memories are from around late '94 and believe it or not, I still remember the way people wore their hair, clothes, and popular TV shows at the time even from being very little. It was all still very reminiscent of the 1980s when I look back now. But in 1995, to me, that was the year that really defined the 90s. Everything about that year from what I can remember and what I look back on now spells out what the 1990s were like. Same goes for the 2000s. The year 2000 was WAY different than 2009. The early years of decades usually reflect on the previous decade and don't start taking on their own image until about the 4th year in.

reply

wait, are you guys trying to tell me that on january 1st of a new decade, there isn't a mass meeting where everyone, everywhere decides to abandon everything that they had adopted for the past 10 years, then adopts a new set of music, fashion, diction, and behaviour that will last for exactly 10 years, no more, no less? this is scandalous!

reply

[deleted]

Don't forget the big hairdos! That was more like 80's than 90's.

reply