MMA beats boxing
Add a bunch of rules (no kicking, no elbows, no knees, no grappling, no ground fighting, etc etc), boxer wins. Take away most rules, MMA fighter wins every time.
shareAdd a bunch of rules (no kicking, no elbows, no knees, no grappling, no ground fighting, etc etc), boxer wins. Take away most rules, MMA fighter wins every time.
shareThey are two completely different sports. Boxers train their whole life to become boxers and MMA fighters train their whole life to become MMA fighters. Your comment sounds like something I would have said when I was 15.
shareYou were 15 last year. Who said anything about how long they train? It's men fighting, take two men who have trained for one year. One MMA and one boxing. No rules and MMA will win.
shareNo one cares about mma. Your fighters make absolutely nothing in pay while Pacquiao and Mayweather are making a combined 250 million. That payout is more then the entire ufc roster made between 2005-2012. How sad is that to be that irrelevant?
shareIts about entertainment value, not just about who would win. Hell, amateur wrestlers have been able to beat professional boxers for a long time, but nobody wants to watch those guys hump each other on the mat. Only reason it even became somewhat popular is it added elements of boxing (striking and knockouts). Otherwise, it would still just be two guys humping each other on the mat.
"Gold buys a mans silence for a time. A bolt to the heart buys it forever"
Watching men rolling around *yawn*
shareLooks like someone's taken too many punches to the head. And I can see why. They're two entirely different sports & rules. And you're not even discussing the doco this page is all about.
Go back to Sherdog, ya troll.
Isn't MMA just the ultimate warrior vs rick rude?
share