'Wanky show'
To reiterate Pete, this is a 'wanky show'
I tried to like it, I really did, I tried to sit through the first three episodes without wanting to get up and turn it off but I just couldn't do it. And that has nothing to do with rafe spall's down-syndromish face.
At first I blamed the structure. The use of a running narrative is clearly something the writers have tried to capitilize after the success of Peep show - only Pete Vs Life has none of the heart nor brains to compete.
Then I realised the problem was me. I've become an elitist when it comes to sitcoms. I like them cutting, like The Thick of It.
I like them morally depraved, like Peep Show, but I also want them to be clever at the same time, like Arrested Development and 30 Rock.
The Inbetweeners is beautifully gratuitous but at the same time you actually care about the characters because they are real and more importantly they are likeable.
Unfortunately, for my liking, Pete Vs Life doesn't encompass all of these things and maybe, in retrospect, I was asking too much of a brand new sitcom.
Or, just perhaps, this program is intended for *beep*-wits