Why soo low ratting.
If it is really good movie as suggested by the reviewers, why soo low ratting???
shareBecause they're full of crap. It's a bore-fest.
share
MovieChat Forums > Afghan Luke (2011) Discussion > Why soo low ratting.
I thought it was decent,...could have been better,...but it's a black comedy,..I think most people are expecting something a little more serious. So they get angry and give it a 1/10,...simple fvcks.
[deleted]
It's probably due to Canadians. They're probably not very happy aboot this movie.
"What this country needs right now... is a Doctor."
I also wonder why such a low rating...
shareMaybe it didn't contain a car chase or enough explosions.....
It's a decent enough movie and definitely not a 4.5(it's current rating).
It's getting worse... 4.4 now.
That makes no sense to me. Even if viewers don't like the story, this is competently filmed, and is not particularly outrageous. I haven't seen the other similar-subject films yet, but that's irrelevant to the quality of this film. I've read the negative reviews, but I still don't see how any rating under 6 is justified.
For me, it's between 7 and 8. It is certainly one of the best recent English Canadian films. I like it when I don't have to be embarrassed by my country's name splashed all over the credits.
I'm calling BS on the 19 of the top 1000 voters who gave it 3.4. Anyone legitimately in the top 1000 (and I don't think I am one) has suffered through enough total garbage to know that this film is nowhere as bad as 3.4. I think a lot of folks don't even watch the films.
This film wasn't anywhere near bad enough to be a 4.7 (current score). I thought it was decent, albeit a little slow at times, but interesting also. That rating is bogus. About a 6.5 would be fair.
Because its a very boring movie
share