Oh c'mon it wasn't that bad, there's certainly been worse, certainly been better. Stallone and DeNiro really put a lot of their physicality into it. I think the way they choreographed it was meant to keep it exciting and to showcase that these men aren't done yet. Having spent 17 years of my life in boxing and watched quite a few exhibition bouts from retirees, those guys are still plenty tough, and I've even seen a few 4-rounders that had two old rivals going at it HARD.
then look at guys like Archie Moore, that guy reigned as Lt. Heavy champ for what, a dozen or so years AFTER he was beaten by Rocky Marciano? He fought people from Joe Louis's era, to Rocky's to Muhammad Ali's! Archie fought a prime Cassius Clay in his mid-50s, and while there was no way he could be Clay, the fact that he even hung in there with him is pretty *beep* impressive (though Muhammad Ali was carrying him if I remember the fight correctly, it's been a long time)
Also look at fighters like Micky Ward when he beat Gatti, there are dozens and dozens of hardcore boxing matches where two fighters past-their-prime give it their all. That's what this fight was about. Keeping in context that these are actor, this is art depicting a sport. Personally I'm glad they dialed-back on the "realism" a bit. It would have distracted from the journey both characters were taking before and during the bout, and imo, it needed that hardcore "oomph" edge-of-your-seat thriller type of fight.
reply
share