Are there a lot of 3D effects throughout the film?
I've only seen the 2D version and while I can notice a few scenes that look to have been meant for 3D (like when Adkins catches the baseball bat during the sporting goods store fight sequence), I didn't notice much else.
Would you say the 3D was well used or just gimicky? (I haven't seen a 3D movie since Jaws 3D and one of the Friday the 13th sequels back in the 80's, lol)
Thanks.
IMO 3D is nothing but a gimmick and its presence hurt this film in the respect fight scenes would go all slow mo then speed up when a punch would make impact
im not a fan of this style of shooting a fight scene a Little is ok but to much makes the intend of appealing to the 3d market as tranparend as the stubid glasses you are forced to have on when watching films in crappy gimmicky fad soon to be a joke of the past 3D
lol sorry went of on a 3D rant then as you can tell i really hate 3D and i feel it is actually hurting the film industry in regards to good story telling and is actually doing its bit to help iradicate celluloid forever and i would hate to live in a where all movies look like HD video i cant go near reality tv not only because of its retarded content but the look of it makes it look so cheap and crap
but i did like this movie and regeneration but i do feel if thay was both shot on film thay would of looked much better
and plese god let 3D die all ready most know its a joke
you will have to forgive the lack of full stops lack of proper spelling im dyslexic but not stupid
I'd like to know the same thing.
share