It's a 3 and that's being generous. The reviewer on the title title page even gave it a 9.
How dumb do you have to be to miss so many of the inconsistencies, impossibilities and gaping plot holes that you give this movie a 9?
Fair play to the makers of this trash - they've found their audience
i agree. i was confused as well. maybe its so bad its good....i feel that way about a few movies i cant even lie
shareAwful awful acting and even worse movie..
This was really bad, really cliched, really stupid.
I still can't understand how she appeared inside the pool after crawling out from under the car and slithering into the yard. Oh well, i still can't understand why the creators of this sad excuse of an action movie didn't notice (or care) about so many inconsistencies.
This was nothing more than a mediocre mash-up of Luc Besson's "killer femmes" previous movies.
Too many plot holes and clichés. Not clever, unique nor very entertaining.
5/10
🐺 Boycott movies that involve real animal violence (& their directors) 🐾
Easily one of the worst films I've ever seen. Had such high hopes for it too. What a waste of money this was. It just tried way to hard.
shareYou can relax, because it wasn't made for you. It was made for a certain kind of viewer who 'gets' that it's a fantasy, surreal, live action cartoon and not real. You must be the more literal type of viewer. and that's fine. You gauge films against the 'reality' you think you know in your head to be 'concrete' and dependable. would you challenge john woo or tarantino the same way you did this? Luc Besson is a master craftsman, storyteller.
It's a movie! Lighten T F up!
and also FYI people assign numbers according to their enjoyment level, not some kind of fucking rubric evaluating shot by shot for continuity errors etc. Me, i give this one an 8.5
it's the vibe, dude. but maybe that's lost on you.
cheers.