Rating???


Ive not seen this yet so i haven't rated it but looking at the rating it has got it doesn't make any sense,it has a scorer of 3 atm with 46 total votes now i realize the score is weighted but even if the high votes and i assume the low votes were discarded the average score should would still be higher unless the IMDB is using some kind of advanced Klingon mathematics

reply

Fact is if your an intelligent person and you have seen the film, the plot, the motives, dead ends literally, you will notice something happened during filming, a switch of directors that fractured the integrity of the film, two people with different concepts & ideas of what this film should be were smashed together leaving a fractured finished product. it's worth a 4.5/10 imo but I'm willing to bet if the initial director finished the film himself this could have earned a 6-7/10 easily
It did have the potential, it's a shame really.



BRAINS!BRAINS!BRAINS!!!(400)
http://www.imdb.com/list/l0fDojvcY5I/

reply

Where did you find out there was a change of director mid film?

I rated it 5/10 btw

reply

Sh!t you know now I can't remember. There is two different directors listed though, I see so many films & post about them it's hard to keep track. It may have been someone that didn't have the right info I'm not sure.

So let's say I just go by the facts, I'm inclined to think that the continuity problem I noticed when I watched it was due to it being handled by two different guys. No matter whether it was a complete hand off or a collaboration it showed to have a very negative impact in the film IMO. If you happen to know the details on what the actual story was behind the film having two directors please let me know as I have a genuine curiosity .
I give it a 4.5/10 which I chose to round down this time.


BRAINS!BRAINS!BRAINS!!!(400)
http://www.imdb.com/list/l0fDojvcY5I/

reply

[deleted]

you're*

reply