MovieChat Forums > The Wrong House (2010) Discussion > Not bad at all for such a low budget fil...

Not bad at all for such a low budget film.

posted 11 years ago by DeepRest
4 replies | jump to latest

Like many of you, I absolutely hate watching movies with a zero budget. But this one was actually a thousand times better than the ones you rent from RedBox and curse the skies for being burned out of $1.35. It actually takes time to establish characters and the main villains are pretty well acted, especially the woman. It's nothing new or ground-breaking by any means, but it's interesting enough to keep you watching all the way through.

You can't eat the ones who talk. They're special. They got aspirations. - Finn

[–] davannacarter 10 years ago

You fall into two categories:

1. You saw a different movie called The Wrong House.

2. You're involved with the production somehow; friends or family of people involved with this movie; or getting paid to write this phony message board post.

Which is it?

[–] DeepRest 10 years ago

3. I have an opinion that differs from yours.

4. Unlike you, I'm not so arrogant as to think my opinion is the only one that matters.

[–] tk_sassy 8 years ago

It started out good, dipped a bit and then totally picked up. For a low budget film once it recaught my attention it was most excellent. Not unlike "The Traveler" - thumbs up for creative efforts!

[–] perfectjade 7 years ago

I thought it was pretty bad but the bad overacting and overly stupid characters annoyed me and overshadowed the plot. The wife especially, literally never stopped to think, everyone reacting from a made up flyer like it's 1930, I could find the previous owner of my house online in 30 seconds... There was a lot to make it bad...