Plotholes galore


[SPOLIERS ALERT!}

Just saw The Double again on cable and I have to say, it was interesting enough but the gaping holes in the plot just makes one wonder if a script editor was ever involved in the production at all.

The way I see it, since Cassius was a master assassin whose best asset was his anonymity, it makes sense that Brutus never knew who his trainer in Moscow was. I can buy that Cassius' handler would punish him for his indiscretion (his "mistake", as he was told over the phone by his handler) in starting a family in Geneva by ordering his wife and child to be killed. But why not eliminate Cassius right away without his even knowing it? After all, his deception meant he could never be trusted again, especially in a paranoid climate like the Cold War (even the tail end of it in 1988). And to tell Cassius that his family has been slaughtered, what did Moscow think he would do, roll over and meekly report back to Mother Russia? Risk losing him to the Americans if Cassius were to defect in revenge? And when Cassius starts going rogue right after that and begins killing off Russian spies and agents and the 'Cassius 7' in retaliation, no one at his agency in Moscow knows who he is? I mean, I can accept that the Russians wouldn't let Western intelligence know who Cassius was, but to let him merrily kill off so many Russian assets in those couple of years without being able to stop him, even after Cassius stopped his revenge spree believing he had eliminated Brutus, why did they wait over 20 years before doing anything about it? I mean, they obviously knew Cassius' cover as CIA operative Shepherdson, having planted him there in the first place. They could have easily gotten to him at any time, before and after retirement.

I don't buy that the Russians didn't know who Cassius or what his cover was all this time; I mean, they had been giving him missions which he had been successfully carrying out all this while before his "mistake", and he had been reporting to his handler like clockwork.

Also Brutus' escape from the hospital (seriously, they send a high-risk prisoner not to the prison infirmary but to an outside hospital with only one or two guards?) would surely have alerted joint FBI-CIA task force far, far earlier, the moment he was sent to the hospital and not hours later after his body was found in the hospital car park.

And the so-called second twist at the end about the revelation that Geary was a Russian sleeper agent, all this suggesting that the Russians didn't know who Cassius was, and taking the trouble to groom and plant Geary to be eventually picked to work in the FBI just so he could eventually work his way up through the ranks to flush out Cassius 20-odd years later. All this trouble by Moscow in the belief that Cassius had settled in the US and not anywhere else in the world? Really?

I'm also fuzzy about Bozlovski's presence in the US with his hit team. So they weren't there to eliminate Cassius but to commit terrorism in the US (evidenced by the discovery of the weapons at the port)? So what happened to the rest of the team, like "the man in the cheap Russian coat"? And after Cassius tells Bozlovski that he is Cassius, shoots, but fails to kill him, Bozlovski doesn't alert his handlers in Russia to Cassius' US identity right away?

And what happens to Geary's nerdy FBI colleague? Having involved him in proving that Shepherdson is Cassius, and conveniently convincing the FBI and CIA that Bozlovski is Cassius, surely Oliver is the loose end that Geary must eliminate right away.

Instead, the film ends with Geary returning to his family, choosing to stay in the US. But ok, fair enough, I can buy that he intends to defy his Russian agency with the excuse that now that he has been invited to join the CIA, his remaining in the US would be more useful. But Oliver knows too much and, seeing how he's constantly going on about wanting to get noticed and get ahead in the Bureau, he will surely be the first to raise the alarm on Geary's theory that Shepherdson is Cassius.

I just wish the film's story and plotting had been a lot, lot more tighter. It would undoubtedly had fared much better at the box office. The bad plotting, lazy writing, and the infamous trailer for the film, killed the film.

PS. With reference to the "was it an error or an indirect joke" in relation to Natalie telling Shepherdson, "Welcome to our commode" instead of "abode", I'm siding with the latter theory that it was a deliberate joke.

reply

Agree with all your points. Quite a few well-known stars, CIA, assassin, how bad can the movie be? Very.

reply

here are my answers, i have yet to watch the director's commentary, so i might get better insights and answers if i did.

1. Regarding why russians didn't kill cassius: Then we wouldn't have this movie? lol. But yeah that is a pretty good question. Some say even his handlers didn't know who cassius was, well then how did they kill his family? The only logic i could gather was that perhaps the identity of cassius was only privy to a very few russians(maybe even just the person he talks to on the phone) and cassius immediately and successfully eliminated them after his family was killed. How he did it, I have no idea. Plus I think maybe the breakup of Soviet Union made him more elusive to the russians.

2. Regarding Brutus in hospital: I think the writers actually did that to set up the later scene with Geary asking paul how did cassius know that they were gonna send brutus to the hospital and not the prison clinic, and paul making up some excuse about insiders in prison. I guess just making the point that Geary is getting more suspicious and Paul's getting more anxious that he's about to be exposed.

3. Regarding grooming Geary to flush out paul in the US: I think paul is suppose to be originally American?(I could be very wrong as Brutus said Cassius was originally a soldier in ussr)The russians had to silence the senator before the fbi nabs him and make him talk(as the senator was "communicating with Moscow"), they had a shipment of weapons coming in at the end signaling they were planning something, so they think to themselves, the only guy who could really mess this up is Cassius, so why not kill the senator the Cassius method and see what happens(Senator has to die anyways). Maybe we'll flush out Cassius in the process. But I do think this scenario is contrived unless Cassius has been actively thwarting russian intelligence efforts in the us and a thorn in russian's side(which the movie does not show)

4. Regarding your fuzzy paragraph: the rest of the team got away, maybe awaiting further orders now boz got killed. So let's say after boz escapes paul's shooting at him and suspects he's really cassius. what can he really tell his handlers? Only a description of the man's features and built and height, american accent. This would really only confirm to the Russians that Cassius is still alive and in the us. And why can't Boz think the self admitted Cassius is just a special agent/detective of some sort? Boz seems to be on a pretty tight schedule and daring as he should've known after the escape that he's in danger but still decides to go for the shipment leading us to believe that he's on an very important assignment?

5. Regarding nerdy fbi colleague Oliver: Geary's premise that Cassius must showup at the crime scene I believe is due to the possibility that Geary knew from info by his handlers that Cassius was a double implanted in the CIA. Thus he would suspect possibly Cassius investigating his own crimes. Thus Geary asks the Oliver to dig up all the original photos. Now I do believe it's very likely oliver recognized paul in many of the photos. But he wasn't privy to the fact that paul was assigned to investigate the Cassius murders back then, and paul's convincing the cia team that Bozlovsky is really Cassius, and the blue file of supposed copycat murder of a woman and a kid was really paul's family. So in the end, Geary could reveal these facts to him and the fact that paul died in killing the real "Cassius" because in oliver's mind: if paul was really Cassius why would he help hunt down and kill the russian agent boz? And let's say he suspects Geary killing one or both of them, why would geary do that if geary himself is a russian double?

6.Regarding geary returning to his family: he knew he doesn't have it in him to leave his family(and i think that's a important theme in the movie, no matter what, when a guy establishes a family and kids, he can't function optimally as an agent anymore), but highland unwittingly(or wittingly?)offered him an out by giving him a more desirable position, this will give him a reason to convince the russians to continue to to let him stay in us and be with the family(i mean how many russian moles are in the cia, not many i don't think). Now the interesting question is, is he going to play both sides, switch sides or stay put?


no thought, no reflection, no analysis, no control, no intention, let it settle itself.

reply

Why would a copycat murder flush Cassius out?

reply

The senator's murder was a mcguffin.


I was born in the house my father built

reply

Not exactly... Besides being something unexplained, a McGuffin also drives the characters, which is hardly the case in this story.

reply

I liked how the someone who had supposedly written a Harvard thesis and was the formost expert in him decided "Cassius always returns to the scene of the crime" and no one said "oh why do you think that" - *shrugs*

reply

As an expert he didn't seem to know that much. Not even what the murder weapon was.

But then how did he get access to national security related material for his thesis?

reply



The movie lost credibility for me when the woman at the little league game asked him what time it was.




Man is the Only Animal that Blushes. Or needs to.
Mark Twain

reply