WARNING: No nudity


...that is, none worth mentioning. I'll do it anyway, though -- that's right, I sacrificed myself and mostly fastforwarded through this godawful crap so you don't have to. I know, I'm a saint.

With the apparent absence of a budget and this excuse of a plot premise, I can't imagine anyone would even consider watching this except for the chance of some good T & A. And there is practically none.

You get a guy's ass in one scene -- and about 2 seconds total of boobage, from 1 chick, who also happens to be without question the least attractive one in the entire cast. Yay.

Seriously, I dare you to find a worse timewaster than this on any shelf near you. I've said it before: "Movies" like this should be required by law to have a sticker saying "Warning; Little to no nudity".

reply

You're an idiot. Your subject title should be "WARNING: No quality nudity" then. There is a difference between nothing and table scraps.

However, it is a pretty disappointing movie. It doesn't really succeed on ANY level, even this easy one.

reply

[deleted]

I wouldn't call 2 seconds of an ugly girl's boobs as nudity or quality nudity. More like a waste of time.

Even still, if someone wanted to see boobs, the possibilities are endless on these here interwebs.

To Elwyn- Your hurtful words were unnecessary.

To Gilknut- Thank you for this post, I will not waste the hard drive space on this garbage.

reply

You're very welcome ;)

reply