don't bother with this, it is dreadfully bad , and if you do try and watch it expect the immediate urge to turn it off early, the first 30 minutes are so horribly written & acted, but then you think maybe it might get better, NO IT DOESN'T!! It's a major waste of time. The good reviews are planted from cast 100%
Too bad there isn't a way to purge segments of memory from the brain!
Sh!t you know my MF"ing name it's
I was just thinking the same thing. Amongst the many disappointed reviews there are a couple of glowing ones which surely can't be real. I know people have different tastes, so I'm not saying everyone should agree with me, but I find it hard to believe that they could genuinely be written by anyone other than people who were involved in the making of the film.
In reference to your title, I'd give the film a 3 though, not a 0. True, it is poor but, c'mon be fair, you must have seen worse.
Oh man have I seen worse, hundreds sadly & will probably see hundreds more.
Actually I gave it a 2, I try & stay away from dishing out 1's unless it's completely abominable & fails at every level. If the cinematography is good or some of the acting was ok, sountrack ect. I will spare it from the dreaded 1. The whole project must fail before I go for the jugular.
In my ratings I must have more 2's & 3's than 1's, My thread was titled like that due to the film crews presence on the rating & reviews, I hate to see the site lose credibility or someone spend their cash on a bomb of a film.
You know when you're on the highway & you pass a cop facing the other side with the radar gun & you flash your lights at on coming traffic to warn em. Well It's kinds like that I guess. Plus I figured out my car gets the best MPG(47-50) at around 90MPH.