The Unexplained Analysis by "Science"
How are 250 ton stones moved? Not by logs, rocks, ropes or sand.
You skeptics have yet to explain that, since science can't either.
How are 250 ton stones moved?Aliens, naturally.
Salter you can paint your AUssie...you are a joke - Matty1933 share
Haha, i was gonna say, just because we cant exactly explain which techniques they used, it therefore has to be Aliens, right?
I mean, i'm not saying its Aliens... but, its Aliens!
OK...then tell me how humans build structures with heavy stones. Logs would be crushed, no evidence of wheels, and you couldn't get enough hands on ropes to pull these blocks.
I'll wait.
by DethstruXioN » Haha, i was gonna say, just because we cant exactly explain which techniques they used, it therefore has to be Aliens, right?
I mean, i'm not saying its Aliens... but, its Aliens!
So by that logic, it should be just as funny when skeptics say, "I'm not saying it wasn't aliens...but it wasn't aliens!"
Right? share
Uhm, no.
Figuring out how man built something is in itself less laughable than trying to find an Alien connection.
Besides, im not sure which site he is referring to, since most sites are explained already, humans were and are capable of great feats, this Alien possibility is a minute minority, so by default, it is not very likely that Aliens actually did something.
Like ive said many times before, i like this show, i want to believe in Aliens, or at least, id like to believe that Aliens actually had something to do with us, but im not convinced by AA.
I only make absolutes when saying that i never fully exclude Alien possibilities, but i am very critical on judging on the given possibilities and theories.
Aside from the nitpickings on the AA people's personalities and motives.
Saying that is wasnt Aliens is normal...
by DethstruXioN » Uhm, no.
Figuring out how man built something is in itself less laughable than trying to find an Alien connection.
Besides, im not sure which site he is referring to, since most sites are explained already, humans were and are capable of great feats, this Alien possibility is a minute minority, so by default, it is not very likely that Aliens actually did something.
Like ive said many times before, i like this show, i want to believe in Aliens, or at least, id like to believe that Aliens actually had something to do with us, but im not convinced by AA.
I only make absolutes when saying that i never fully exclude Alien possibilities, but i am very critical on judging on the given possibilities and theories.
Aside from the nitpickings on the AA people's personalities and motives.
Saying that is wasnt Aliens is normal...
That of course all went without saying, I was merely pointing out the very real tendency for "skeptics" here to dismiss ALL possible alien interaction with the very types of comments I referred to.
Those comments ARE made here after all. Given the usual definitive manner in which they're usually presented though, I was merely pointing out that they're as laughably illogical when presented in that manner as some of the claims they're intended to discredit/dismiss. share
Well, im only trying to tell you that i do believe in Aliens, i just havent personally been convinced by Ancient Aliens itself.
You can, by all means hold on and pry open the possibility of it being Aliens, that is your right.
Im just saying, i find the Ancient Alien platform very shaky, i wish there was a better outlet for credibility out there.
EDIT: the OP does exactly the same though, he already stated "Not by logs, rocks, ropes or sand." As if that is fact, and even if it is a fact, why does it have to be Aliens? Why would it make more sense when the majority of everything we built, is in fact, built by us.
Therefore it is normal, or default to assume that man made it, whatever he is referring to.
by DethstruXioN » Well, im only trying to tell you that i do believe in Aliens, i just havent personally been convinced by Ancient Aliens itself.
You can, by all means hold on and pry open the possibility of it being Aliens, that is your right.
Im just saying, i find the Ancient Alien platform very shaky, i wish there was a better outlet for credibility out there.
EDIT: the OP does exactly the same though, he already stated "Not by logs, rocks, ropes or sand." As if that is fact, and even if it is a fact, why does it have to be Aliens? Why would it make more sense when the majority of everything we built, is in fact, built by us.
Therefore it is normal, or default to assume that man made it, whatever he is referring to.
Well, I don't even know why we're talking about the show or AA theory since my comment was directed only at the "skeptics" here who make the types of claims I referred to in my initial post.
As for what the OP stated, he was talking specifically about "250 ton rocks". Therefore it is normal to question whether something comprised of such rocks COULD have been made by man when the "man" usually being referred to by the "skeptics" here are the ones who were still working with "logs, rocks, ropes or sand".
Maybe there is a lost age of man that had the technology to do so at some point in the distant past and THAT is the "man" that made and positioned those 250 ton rocks, but again, that's never the "man" that the "skeptics" here are referring to...hence my initial comment. share