On a lighter note, doesn't radioactively on humans with enriched uranium occur quicker than depicted in the film
Edit: Nevermind the ending explains it all
You're probably right, I'd never heard of it until today. Not surprised as while it was an OK film wasn't exactly box office material. Would have been a lot better if Louise Redknapp and Winstones daughter hadn't been in it.
What is it with UK films ... don't we have enough actors any more that we have to use the scrapings?
Also IMDB haven't mentioned the crazy credits end scene (after the credits) where you see the potato glowing in it's new deposit box.
☺
Fortytwo? FortyTwo? what sort of puerile, pathetic, stupid answer is that? Everyone knows it's 43.
I just went back and watched the end credits to the end. I wouldn't have noticed that had you not mentioned it. Nice one. lol
''All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain .... Time to die''.
[deleted]
Purportedly based on a true story, but coming from the East End myself, I have never heard this story. Also opening credits says based on a true story, but later on, "Based on an original story by Kenneth Sneath".
Anyone got an opinion or is part of the growing trend to add appeal to the film by falsely claiming it's pedigree?