By reading your post I can see that you're not a cycling fan, and so forth you don't know much about what you're saying. If I ever encounter a conversation such as that, (one where I don't know what I'm talking about) I don't engage in it. But that doesn't stop the other people who can't help themselves. Such as you.
Almost everyone in cycling dopes and still do to this day. Wrong, the tests for doping have finally caught up to the most popular and most advantageous peds used by cyclists and it's not easy to get away with it anymore. The testing agencies also keep the samples now in banks in case better techniques are perfected and samples need to be retested.
Now why aren't they all doping anymore, as you like to say that they are, and how can I tell? Well if you were a fan of the sport and followed it you'd notice that the overall tdf times have not leveled off, which would suggest continuous ped use, but they have actually become slower again. There is no one single person dominating the GT's, we seem to be having new winners every single year. And that is consistent in a cycling world, where an off day for one of the riders could ruin the entire tour and produce a whole different winner.
There probably will be dopers again, but on the same level as we saw in the 90's through the early 2000's will be quite a long time. Where entire teams were now known to be on a program of taking peds. The price to pay is pretty substantial now, it's in better interest for the riders to ride clean than to risk getting caught.
reply
share