Ronan with a gun again?


I just watched Hanna today. I enjoyed it and was thinking it would be cool if there was a sequel. Now knowing that Ronan is playing a young assasin again in this movie will have to do.

-------------------
That didn't take much convincing....Ho!

reply

Ronan is a good actress and surprisingly she's a believable "assassin." When I saw her name attached I was comforted, she's great.

reply

If you think Saoirse isn't diversifying her projects enough, check out this article.

Saoirse Ronan Ruins Lives!
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
http://thefilmexperience.net/blog/2012/4/18/saoirse-ronan-ruins-lives. html
The poster for Saoirse Ronan's latest Byzantium has just been released. It's a vampire movie from Neil Jordan who is no stranger to supernatural beasties (see also: The Company of Wolves, Interview with the Vampire, The Crying Games ... what? There's no other explanation for how indelibly creepy Miranda Richardson is in that movie!)
Question: When will Saoirse Ronan ever be cast as a non-lethal girl again? The ridiculously talented young star (who just turned 18... god, time flies) just keeps playing killers whether literally or metaphorically. Let's review:
Atonement (2007) DESTROYER OF LIVES
The Lovely Bones (2009) DEAD GIRL
Hanna (2011) ASSASSIN
Violet and Daisy (2011 still awaiting release) ASSASSIN
Byzantium (coming soon) VAMPIRE
Order of the Seven (coming soon... another Snow White movie) WARRIOR
The Host (coming soon) DANGEROUS POSSESSING ALIEN
How I Live Now (coming soon) NORMAL GIRL THRUST INTO VIOLENT SURVIVAL MODE

Second generation vampiress Saoirse Ronan in "Byzantium"
I realize she's got those spooky ice blue Pfeifferian eyes -- already well cast as La Pfeiffer's daughter in I Could Never Be Your Woman (one of her only roles without a body count) – but what is her management thinking? Diversify!

reply

she is still so young. She can play these fun roles and then in her 20's do more romantic or sexier stuff. She is fine right now.

reply

Yea, although well meaning in its intentions it's ultimately myopic in its view.

reply