MovieChat Forums > Nice Guy Johnny (2010) Discussion > Annoying guy Johnny is more apt

Annoying guy Johnny is more apt


Johnny is not only ridiculously nice, but also clueless and utterly annoying. In fact, as the movie wore on I began to believe that it wasn't so much Johnny's niceness that was his problem - it was the fact that he was basically, for all intents and purposes a dumb ass, for lack of better terminology.

First, we find out that Johnny has great virtue. So much so that he could be bordering on Sainthood - were he not so meek and unaware. The gorgeous, fun, vivacious, funny, intelligent and extremely sexy blonde tennis player is no match for them. Try as she might to show him that life is about much more than being subservient to a domineering woman and forfeiting his career goals and all hope of a happy future, he simply continues to be a clueless mope and trudge forward, all the while bitching and complaining about how unhappy he is. While he should be having an absolute epiphany and thanking his uncle for opening his eyes to what his life could be like if only he could successfully grow a pair of stones, this guy remains thoroughly stubborn, certain that his uncle is merely a scumbag womanizer with no insight, wisdom or inclination to further anyone's cause but his own. I'm a fan of Ed Burns as an actor, but this simply does not sound like a plausible premise to me.

On top of it all, he allows his fiance to verbally emasculate him for something that he did not do - and that she perfectly well knew he was not capable of...being the clueless puppet he was, and still tried to do everything he could to convince her and win back her love. Nice to a fault? Absolutely. But being nice was not the only fault in Johnny's repertoire. This could have been a much better film had the lead character not been such a thoroughly frustrating embarrassment to himself.

reply

he was so annoying that he became unlikable.




When there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...

reply

Yeah, and this type of film is becoming cliche. As someone else mentioned, kind of a "Garden State" rip off, complete with the coffee house soundtrack shoved down your throat.
Another blase Edward Burns written film, sigh...

This film seems to be loved by the few posters on these threads, but I get the feeling that very few people have actually seen this film. So, these must be the hardcore Edward Burns fans.

reply

I enjoyed it and I am not a "hardcore" Ed Burns fan. It was nothing like Garden State. I'm not even sure why people are forcing a connection there. B/c of the soundtrack? Garden State didn't invent awesome soundtracks. They've been around for much longer than 2004, I promise you.

I don't think he's that great of a writer, but I am impressed at how quickly he can pump out content. And I am confused as to how he kept getting money to make movies after making a series of films that all lost money.

I think he's a good actor. Not a ton of range, but great in his niche.

I read his book (Independent Ed) out of boredom/curiosity and while I like the guy I am annoyed at how much "luck" this guy keeps having. His dad got him a job at ET. While there he shared an elevator with Robert Redford. Talked his way into Sundance. Won the big award there. Got on the map. (there's a lot more, but I'm not turning this post into a novel). But every time he hits a wall there is someone (usually "a friend of a friend") coming to his rescue.

So yeah, I did enjoy this film. And I am not a huge Burns fan.

reply

Cool.

reply

[deleted]