MovieChat Forums > Kon-Tiki (2013) Discussion > The film seemed kind of staged.

The film seemed kind of staged.


Like, whenever its relevant to the story, the ocean around them is full of sharks, whales, dark glowy thingies, etc., but whenever it's not relevant, the oceans are completely empty of all life, everyone sits with their feet over the side with no fear. I realize that even if there were sharks, it's not likely that they would see or if they did actually be able to get a bite out of a foot hanging slightly over the float, but that's not really how the human mind works, and even Herman who is otherwise deadly scared of sharks do this.

I also dislike how the film is about faith and the human spirit, how Thor's faith in his convictions lead to a mad expedition that its only a blind chance that didn't kill himself and everyone else. I dislike how the film fails to mention that, in fact, he was wrong. His faith was misplaced. His teori was wrong. Polynesia WAS colonized from Asia, not South America. It seems like an important detail to give us. And while the film doesn't directly say anything that isn't true (it never says his theory was right either), it strongly implies it. Its implied throughout the film that if he can complete the journey, this will prove his theory, but it actually just proves that it was possible for South Americans to float to Polynesia, it doesn't actually prove that they did it, nor does it have any relevance for any other evidence for or against his theory.

So yeah, while I thought most of the sea scenes were really beautiful, I didn't really like the film as a whole.

Rating: Three out of seven

-
"A little fermented curd would do the trick"
"It is I, Leclerc!"

reply

Thor did not care if anyone believed him or not. His intentions was to show that traveling from South America to Polynesia was possible, his intentions was never to prove anyone wrong or right.

Fear not the darkness, but welcome its embrace.

reply

my fellow poster apparently didn't particulary like the film but
was it for the right reason? was it for the fact the current prevailing
thoughts on the migration goes against Thor H's theory which isn't
mentioned in the film or that in and off itself they thought the film
didn't work?

reply

Who the %$#@ rates movies out of "7?"

reply

Helena Blavatsky Septenary



---------------------------------------
http://img1.imagilive.com/0813/_____.jpg

reply

Actually it's pretty close minded to think that human migration only went one direction. Quite a bit of archaeological evidence starting to show that humans migrated in all directions almost simultaneos

reply

This film has many flaws, but I for one am glad that it was made. It was about time somebody took a stab at adapting Hayerdahl's account to the big screen.

reply

You should see the documentary. I think it makes things much clearer and it was never dull.

reply

At the end of his documentary, Heyerdahl says that Kon-Tiki's voyage does not prove that ancient Peruvians did it, only that it was possible, which is what he set out to do.

By the way, all movies are staged.

reply

so a movie is staged? what a shock!

---------------------------------------------
Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

reply

[deleted]