Question (spoilers)
I recognize, like any film, this is somewhat interpretative, but just so I understand this correctly, all the visions of Tricia's evil dead husband she was experiencing in the first half of the film had nothing to do with the actual point of the film? In the end, the actual point was a creature that although supernatural, had no penetration into someone's dreams, and therefore those hallucinations Tricia had were wholly coincidental? Honestly, that's kinda weak. I liked when the film went in a different direction, but to not tie the first half with the second seems like poor writing. Thoughts?
share