Why do you think the Woodmans consented to be filmed?
I confess to feeling ambivalent about this.
On the one hand, I'm grateful that they consented to participate in the making of this documentary and to opening their private lives to such intense and possibly even searing scrutiny. It feels like an act of courage and even humility.
I appreciate Betty's profound observation that art is intrinsically tied up with memory. It ties together the various strands in this documentary very effectively.
But then I consider what Charlie describes as his parents' obsession with their daughter's "legacy." Who wouldn't feel a sense of revulsion at the strange mix of grief therapy, narcissism, relentless competitiveness, and self-promotion that has apparently driven the exhibitions of their daughter's work?
Betty starts off humbly, noting that "As Francesca's work has become more and more known, she's the famous artist and we've become the famous artist's family." But she goes on to talk about her pride in a way that sounds like "naches from the daughter we helped drive to suicide."
Then, apparently sensing the grotesque awfulness of that sentiment, she concedes that "at times it rubs you the wrong way."
Except that the meaning of that remark, not immediately apparent, is clarified this way: "Hey wait a minute. I'm an artist too."
That old narcissism, rearing its ugly head again.
George too: "I may not be getting a great deal of attention, but to stay alive is a pretty good thing to do."
Yup, George at age 77 excels in one way that Francesca never can.