MovieChat Forums > Chasing Mummies (2010) Discussion > The History Channel's BRILLIANT Revenge!

The History Channel's BRILLIANT Revenge!


If you visit the King Tut exhibit in NYC, at the Discovery Center, you exit the exhibit straight into the gift shop, where the first thing you will see is an enormous cutout of Zahi Hawass surrounded by an enormous display of hats for sale -- the sort of hat Indiana Jones wears, but which Dr. Hawass probably thinks is now identified with himself. Hey, kids, you too can look just like a blowhard grayhaired Egyptian antiquities Czar! If the hats are selling, it's probably to people who repose their confidence in the unlikelihood of anybody in the world to whom the name Harrison Ford means anything ever thinking they're trying to emulate Zahi Hawass.

It's no secret that you can't get access to a mummy or a pyramid in Egypt these days without kissing Dr. Hawass's fat ass, and unlike bureaucrats the world over who are content with credit and set access and maybe a few bucks under the table, Dr. Hawass demands to be made a STAR!!! Have you ever wondered why there is scarcely a western archaeologist to be seen on American television anymore poking around ancient Luxor who isn't merely scuttling around the edges of the Zahi Hawass Show and looking like his assistant? Before anybody dares disagree with him on camera, they have to do obeisance to his tremendous expertise as an archaeologist.

Well, he's credentialed, and maybe his expertise is tremendous, but one wonders. Whatever else he may know, Dr. Hawass imparts no information on any television show that isn't already known to any fourteen year old boy with an amateur crush on ancient Egypt and a National Geographic subscription. He is prone to state as fact (or to flourish as theories he dares you to disagree with) ideas that are at best unproven and at worst in considerable dispute, like his theory that the Egyptians demolished almost completely an intact royal pyramid simply because the particular pharaoh entombed there was thought (that they thought it, or that they were right if they did is far from established) to have murdered his own father.

But Zahi Hawass is somebody the networks are stuck with. It's a surprise when you see any of his assistants interviewed separately, but it's no surprise when Hawass is missing altogether, because it never happens. Every documentary on basic cable now focusing on Egypt is the Zahi Hawass Show.

So why not simply give him his own show? Well gee, everybody already is sick of the sight of him, so wouldn't that be a bit much? I mean, a show in which the old fart is in every single scene? Wouldn't that make the public even sicker of him?

You bet your sweet ass it would, and that's why I think the History Channel has now done it. Not that Zahi hasn't been hinting for such a show, or even demanding one. I think those things are entirely possible. But the real reason for the History Channel to do it is, I suspect, because they have all seen "Good Night and Good Luck" or the Army/McCarthy hearings, and recall how the cold light of day in sufficient quantities on Joe McCarthy exposed his true nature. Maybe they're remembering the scene in "A Face in the Crowd" where Patricia Neal keeps the microphone on so Andy Griffith's Lonesome Rhodes can he heard by the public saying what he really thinks of them.

One thing Hawass has been able to do up to now is seem genial on camera -- avuncular, grandfatherly. He smiles a lot, and says his crap -- no matter how unexceptional or dubious -- with bouncy enthusiasm. He has managed to look as much like the old Coca Cola Santa Claus as any well-connected member of the Egyptian oligarchy and servant of its one-party state is likely to look. Boy, not on this show.

Hawass insults, screams, pouts, browbeats, patronizes, snarls and otherwise shows his ass in ways the producers of antiquities shows have probably been editing out of other shows for years, and dreaming of including. They have a grand excuse to show the whole picture here. They almost have to. It would probably destroy the narrative flow beyond repair if you didn't see moments like Hawass coming to a fast boil -- zero to 750 degrees in ten seconds -- and screaming at a whole village worth of workers spontaneously celebrating the finding of a mummy to shut the hell up or he's leaving. Their singing is only a faint background sound while Hawass pontificates on camera next to the mummy, and certainly wouldn't keep his mike from recording him, but the only Golden Calf anybody's allowed to dance around when Hawass is around is Hawass.

This show is going to absolutely ruin any lingering delusions on the part of viewers that Hawass is in any understood sense a "sweet old guy." It's Payback Time at the History Channel. Oh, they'll still have to pretend he farts violets and turn every documentary into a gilded frame for his fame-hungry face, but never again will that face seem like a benign one we all just happen to be sick of from overexposure. Now that everybody is going to know Hawass isn't all over their TV screen because cable producers revere him or are fond of him, audiences are probably going to get wise to the real reason. You want mummies and pyramids, you gotta have Hawass. He's the the equivalent of those bisexual porn films in which a guy who wants to commit adultery with another man's wife has to get plowed by her husband too.

Well by damn, look who's getting effed on this show. For once it's Dr. Hawass. The joy in the editing rooms and executive suites, and in university archaeology departments in America and Europe, must be uncontrolled every time Hawass (like a Saudi princess whipping her Filipino housemaid) turns purple and screams at some respectful and unoffending underling whose own Ph.D. from Harvard is at least as good at Hawass's from the University of Pennyslvania. The wheels of justice grind slowly but they grind exceeding fine.

Health reform passed. Is your grandmother dead yet?

reply

[deleted]

Yeah, I too am hopeful that this whole train wreck of a show is an elaborate gambit by History to discredit him once and for all.

I do hope you're right. However, I think that the History Channel should issue some kind of disclaimer or advisory at the beginning of the show stating that this show is not representative of the methods of archeology throughout the rest of the world. They should also list some contacts for viewers so that they can voice objections to the Egyptian government and archeological organizations. The entire situation is a disgraceful embarassment.

My fear is that this show will repulse students who might be considering going into this field. Hawass' control of Egyptology feels identical to having had some dictator invade and take total control of an entire country. The man is a megalomaniac. Very scarey!

reply

I recall reading, and this was several years ago, that the annual salary of an Egyptian is 500 bucks. I used to talk to an Egyptian guy at the gym, he was a eye surgeon, and he told me the economy was very bad. A westerner could go there and live like a king on vaction because people are practically giving stuff away to make a small amount of money.

One time he asked me, what I thought of that. I could see him waiting for me to cheer about it, but I'm not that kind of person. There's no way that I could pay a poor guy a penny for something that's worth five dollars. I would not be happy with that, and I told him so. I could tell he was pleased. I'd be paying them triple what they were asking just to feel like an ethical person.

My point in telling that story is that I think Hawass obviously knows that Egypt got raped culturally by certain westerners and wants to build the country back up. Now, I will say that Egyptians allowed the country to get raped because they became decadent and part of that is probably Islam's fault. It's a "things are better after you're dead" religion and they have rules against art, icons, and all the stuff you'd find in ancient Egypt. But, that's not Hawass' fault and if he believes that he can create an industry for Egyptians byt Egyptians, then I salute him. Every other coutry with massive tourism does it, so why not them.

Again, the country is very poor, but has a wealth of interesting things to talk about and show, so they should do the showing.


reply

The presence of Egypt's own monuments and artifacts on its own soil is indeed a powerful generator of tourist revenues, but I think Hawass grossly overestimates the value of his own physical self in generating interest in Egypt and its antiquities. If I thought, for example, that every Egyptian tour guide was like Hawass -- overselling everything, making the experience all about himself, bellowing, strutting, blowing up at regular intervals -- I might forgo the pyramids. The very last thing I will purchase is a copy of the silly man's hat.

Health reform passed. Is your grandmother dead yet?

reply

I recall reading, and this was several years ago, that the annual salary of an Egyptian is 500 bucks.
But then a loaf of bread there is what, ½¢? Whereas here it is $2.

--
Synetech

reply

"However, I think that the History Channel should issue some kind of disclaimer or advisory at the beginning of the show stating that this show is not representative of the methods of archeology throughout the rest of the world."

Yeah, they're not going to do that. Why? Because he'd ban them from shooting in Egypt ever again! It's far better to just let him show his ugliness to the world, thinking he's doing a great show.

reply

Exactly.

Health reform passed. Is your grandmother dead yet?

reply

Your concept is interesting and I do agree with a few things you've said, but in my opinion there's absolutely no way in hell that the head of programming at the History Channel would ever under any circumstances green-light a tv program just because they wanted to make someone look bad, or to prove a point. Think about it; a cable network like the History Channel has an extremely super tight budget and precious few time slots for original programming. There's a lot of risk associated with what shows they choose to invest in. They have filming cost, crew cost, travel expenses, talent salaries, and millions upon millions in development and marketing. These executives have their jobs on the line every time a project gets canceled. And when a show doesn't do as well as they expected it hurts their relationships with advertisers. When they go begging to those advertisers for another new show, they may have to reduce the amount that they usually charge because of past failures. If any network or network CEO's were willing to risk all of that for petty revenge, then god help that network because they are doomed to fail. I can't think of anything more irresponsible than that.


+-----------------------------------+
www.demonspencer.com
www.blueopt.blogspot.com

reply