MovieChat Forums > Cleanskin (2012) Discussion > (Spoilers) Conclusion Question

(Spoilers) Conclusion Question

posted 12 years ago by lordmackery
12 replies | jump to latest

Now I know that the secrete service tried to orchestrate the attacks by co ordinating with the preacher for political gain...

But what exact political gain was that? To get more security in the country?

[–] Orbtastic 12 years ago

Yeah.

[–] harold-sweeney21 12 years ago

And to win the election for the opposition party. The election is shown throughout on the tv spots.

[–] moizmad 11 years ago

So we're asked to believe that these people will orchestrate terrorist bombings in their own country where many innocent people will die solely for winning an election? I mean, we're not talking about brainless thugs here, we're talking about highly educated, well off people of good standing in the country they live in. If that's what it takes to win, it's not worth winning. I just don't buy into these conspiracy theories about our elected officials sinking to that level just for money and power. Our societies might as well be run be Satan himself, couldn't be any worse.

[–] illybones 11 years ago

Its a movie at the end of the day.

[–] r_cadell 11 years ago

It does happen though. There have been quite a few false flag operations in our lifetimes alone.

[–] revengine 8 years ago

Came here to say the same thing. Not a bad movie otherwise, but the whole motivation - the Charlotte character orchestrating all the bombings just to get the other political party a win so she could gain a promotion. Couldn't buy it.

"If you're waiting for a woman to make up her mind, you may have a long wait." Preacher

[–] chilone 11 years ago

I find it completely impossible to believe that a politician/political party would be intentionally dishonest or engage in anything illegal to gain/stay in power.

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] cyguration 8 years ago

You forgot to put the /s at the end of your post, sir. I almost didn't detect your sarcasm at first.

[–] chilone 8 years ago

Sorry. Lol :)

I don't love her.. She kicked me in the face!!

[–] lemner 11 years ago

It was to get the party and/or certain people elected, to get more power over the public, because they give up freedoms in exchange for security, and specifically, the female boss was promoted to top dog over her previous superior. I figure over 40 mostly innocent people died.

A lot more died on both sides in Iraq, which was apparently so the right people could get even more obscenely rich on oil, as well as curtailing public freedoms in favor of more government control.

Semper Contendere Propter Amoram et Formam

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]