MovieChat Forums > Sleeping Beauty (2011) Discussion > The smallest penis ever commited to film...

The smallest penis ever commited to film?


I think that old man has snatched the trophy from Ken Jeong, how about you?

reply

The first time I saw the film I couldn't visibly make out a penis during that scene. Honestly. It almost didn't appear to exist. I know it was a wide shot and he wasn't close up to the camera, but I was really confused by the scene because for a second I thought he might have some genital deformity or something. I've watched the movie several times since and now can sort of see a penis there, but it's incredibly tiny and nearly invisible; it's not even small in a normal sense of "small". Small penises are even bigger than that.

reply

I think the older you get the smaller it gets. :(

reply

Sad, but true.

reply

But how?

reply

Less blood circulation there.

reply

So? They can just lose weight right? Hypothetically it is the same size but a flow problem.

reply

It's not only the weight.

You can maintain the same weight but have fat deposited in your organism, reducing blood flow.

In addition you have less testosterone.

reply

[deleted]

the guy had a monster bush

reply

After watching the scene once again I can safely say that his penis is about the size of a young woman's thumb. Two inches at the most?

reply

[deleted]

What does size of that guy's dick have to do with anything? You could make another observation that the lead character had the smallest mosquitoe bites commited to film. I enjoy realism in a movie, so not everyone has to have a big or avg size dick or tits.

reply

Somebody has big problems here..and makes me feel inadequate to boot.

reply


His bush was so big, I had to cock my head to the side like a confused puppy in order to make out his goods. LMAO! We had a rather good chuckle at that scene.


Excuse me--ya'll lookin' for a dead body??

reply


¿Or did you side your head to the cock?

reply

That's more like it!

reply

There was nothing realistic about the size of that man's dingus. It was like a little Christmas light.

reply

Yeah, he was tiny, but it's not his fault. He didn't ask for the compact model when schlongs were being handed out at birth.

reply

Oh how the unenlightened like to make fun of those that don't fit into their little mindset of this vast world.

You would be suprised at how many "little" Button Numbs turn into eight inch poles when it's time to play.

Just because with women, what you get is what you see ... isn't always the truth with us guys.

reply

Perhaps you could save this for your psychiatrist.

reply

HA!

reply

Speaking from a womans point of view-- a man who is flaccid doesn't really give ANY indication as to what size he will be when erect. Some men are growers and some are showers.

Just because you can'ts see much when a man is flaccid- doesn't mean there isn't much when erect.

Men get too caught up in the whole size issues anyways. Men care about it a heck of a lot more then most women do.

reply

My cousin worked as a grip on the film, she said that was just CGI and that that particular member was over nine inches long and as thick as a can of Pringles.

Send in the clowns...

reply

you sound like you didn't see the guy's junk in the film. that was ABNORMALLY small.

reply

[deleted]

its a sort of mark, like porno movies need to have big dicks as a sign of serious, this movie needed a little thing to show us its a "chic", brilliant and intellectual movie.
But more seriously what about a sort of castration ? a way to say, women are definitively the mistresses of all the game who is named life.

reply

Nope. A man named Yaniv Sharon takes that trophy. Watch him run naked in a movie called "Terror Firmer". It's on IMDb. He is only 20 something in the film and he has an unnaturally small penis.

I just love film.

reply