MovieChat Forums > Harry's Law (2011) Discussion > cheap shot at casey anthony case

cheap shot at casey anthony case

posted 12 years ago by jive12345
2 replies | jump to latest

i cant believe what i saw. its so preposterous for david e kelley to take a cheap shot at the casey anthony verdict on a show where legal activism is promoted in every episode and the defenses are argued on and won on the flimsiest of grounds. jury sequestration syndrome? you gotta be f&%$ing kidding me!

good thing that jury skipping b!tch got what she deserved. seems like the judge is the only sane one on this show. but i cant fully blame her tho, with some of the verdicts weve seen its a given that the juries in Ohio are a bit wacko

-----------------------------------------

[–] staticline1 12 years ago

Who are you, Nancy Grace? Her point was made, there is no process to vet the mental and emotional health of the people who are selected for jury duty. Do you disagree with that?

[–] xenatikkanen-1 12 years ago

The original poster was vile and moronic. Worse than Nancy Grace! LOL

Moreover, a cheap shot at Casey Anthony case? Hello? Anthony case, OJ. Obviously there was a line of though. Everyone thought that both were guilty, but both got off. Maybe it was wrong or right, but they go on the evidence.

The episode was a 12 Angry Men knockoff, if anything, but the original poster probably wouldn't have noticed. If you are going to be bullied into a verdict to please everyone else or you are going to be threatened based on how much the case cost, we have a real problem. If anything, how the judge could get away with that behavior is outrageous. Plus, to have the victims in the court as they decide about the "Runaway Juror?" Using them as fodder to browbeat the girl? This all sounds criminal to me; not as much as what the poor victims suffered, but this is just wrong.

There doesn't have to be an actual syndrome to know that this would be a possibility, based on what happens with juries. What Harry said was right - it should be decided by the judge (then again, that could get political or biased too). Maybe just have Kate Reed judge every case (Fairly Legal on USA), hehe.