The fact is

A movie is good when tons of posters go to post about the movie because it was so interesting it makes you think long after watching it and you crave also to discuss it. This film however has mostly posters on here with a lot to talk and think about but not interesting theories on the film, but too many questions. When a film leaves an audience with unending questions, such as this board proves... It's like 80/20 first being questions and trying to figure out all these mundane details to understand it. And 20 percent theories on what the premise means. If the ending or any of the film gave more answers it would be far more fascinating and less frustrating, it can still be slightly ambiguous but at least give an overall idea to work with not just eh figure it out yourselves along with tons of inconsistencies. The film coherence leaves a lot of ambiguity but it overall has enough of an explanation to understand what is going on overall. Which is why I think that's a great film. I like ambiguity. But this comes off as lazy writing verses that. In the end most of us can say in all honesty "it doesn't make sense" and then ask each other a million questions to try figure out why. That's not a satisfying film but a frustrating one that leaves us feeling annoyed and empty and the film feels empty as well.