Not so original...


OK, I'm definitely in the minority when I question a film such as this on it's originality. I understand that. But what's so original about it. Jonze takes an ages old story about self-sacrifice and true love, and updates it with robots.

At a point I thought it was going to turn into an allegory about being in a relationship with a self destructive partner, and how them falling apart ultimately leads to your own demise... That would have been genius.

Instead, we get rehashed goods. Some more of the same, repackaged.

reply

I thought that the allegory of how being with a self-destructive partner can lead to your own demise was pretty apparent in the film, no? do you remember how it ends?!

I also think it's a little reductive to suggest that this is merely a retreading of the age old story of self-sacrifice and true love - with robots. I think the film handles the metaphor beautifully. It touches upon themes broader than self-sacrifice and true love, looking at issues of identity, of race and class, in, i thought, a genuinely sophisticated and poignant way. The scene where the old lady chastises the robot Anne for driving a car, and then turns to Sheldon saying "You're not allowed to drive cars" is not only humourous in it's execution, but quite profound too.

I think what's ultimately so wonderful about this film's creativity, though, is Spike Jonze's robot design. His lo-fi, junkyard aesthetic for the robots is charming, and entertaining in its own right, but he also pulls off a greater feat: he makes you care. These aren't slick cyborgs with human faces - Sheldon literally has a 10 year old PC for a head! He looks, frankly, rubbish and yet you emotionally engage with him on so many levels. In these days of sickening over-saturation of CGI in movies, where every wrinkle on every blue-skinned alien can be manipulated to convey "emotion", this feels wholly original, and very refreshing.

Admittedly, the whole robots-being-more-human-than-human thing has been seen before, but this film doesn't even feel like that. It just feels like a powerful love story, with an interesting message - and robots!

reply

I guess within the contxt of the film, I figured Anne really wasnt a tragic character in the self destructive sense. I felt as if she were genuine, honest, and caring, far and away from being considered selfish, manipulative and self destructive in the sense of say, an alcoholic or an addict.

I believe that fact that "its just a love story" is reinforced with the hopefulness of the ending. I guess I just wanted it to end on a more tragic note?

I will gladly make a comparison between WALL-E and I'M HERE: WALL-E accomplished 10 times more in its first 30 minutes than I'M HERE managed to.

reply

I see what you are saying, but there is nothing wrong with revisiting themes. After all themes more often revisit us. Are you the type of person who says this is so cliche' every time you fall in love? Love has been around for a long long time, and will be around for an even longer time. I have not seen a love story presented in this fashion yet. Id rather see the robots try love out than see another romantic comedy. The theme is unoriginal yes, but the story is absolutely original. Take all of your favorite films and i guarantee you there is a story that came before it with the same theme. Its how the theme is presented that counts.

reply



First off, I loved it. I thought it was beautiful.


Secondly, it reminded me very much of The Giving Tree book by Shel Silverstein, which I also loved.



"You paid for parking? For me?"

reply

I haven't seen this film yet (I really want to), but I just thought that I'd point out that from what I have read about it WAS actually based on The Giving Tree. And Sheldon, I believe was named after Shel Silverstein...

reply

I was also thinking The Giving Tree while watching this.

Reminded me of an animated short on youtube called 'Draw With Me'. Very bittersweet. Check it out if you enjoyed this

reply

wow shows how much you payed attention ctownfilm. The main girl robot is not named Anne.

reply