MovieChat Forums > War Horse (2011) Discussion > The Army stealing food and animals

The Army stealing food and animals


OK the army needs food, but at least leave some for the people. At 78 minutes in-I missed the beginning. They steal the man's food and even the jars of food. Hope they leave some for them to eat and live on. It wold take months to grow some more. I understand about the horses. But they portray the army as thieves in this part of the movie. I doubt they were thieves. But were hungry.



Maj. John Sheppard: Hi, folks. I hope I didn't crash-land on anybody.

reply

Well apparently the Germans left enough for them, because when they come back months later and take the horses, the man and his grandaughter are still alive and clearly not starving.

reply

Yes, but some farmers must have been struggling in the past. Some still do.
Would the Army take every single bit of food?

Maj. John Sheppard: Hi, folks. I hope I didn't crash-land on anybody.

reply

[deleted]

Can't believe they would do that. Nowadays they wouldn't do that. Wonder what else they would do.

Maj. John Sheppard: Hi, folks. I hope I didn't crash-land on anybody.

reply

Hate to break it to you, it still happens to this day. I served in in Iraq and we did still food from local shops when we ran out of our MRE's. It was sad, but we didn't have much of a choice.

reply

This was a war but the army of my country is nick named 'Chicken Thieves' even in peace time! A name given by villagers where army units are kept. Hope someone guesses correctly what country I'm referring to!

reply

I'll venture Pakistan?

reply

India, google for more!

reply

I was surprised they let them live or didn't torch the buildings.
Really..? Why would they see these civilians as enemies? What country were they in in this scene?






I'm not a control freak, I just like things my way

reply

[deleted]

You don't sound cynical at all (at least not to me; raw facts are my sort of thing, and I always tell folks, "I'm not pessimistic, I'm just realistic.").


"Famine, disease, and accidents" doesn't really cover outright murder. And I'm not sure "military action" does either. But I assume the latter is meant to do so.


In any case, this should answer the OP's question even further then. It basically means that stealing their food is nothing compared to what really went down in real life, in the real war.






I'm not a control freak, I just like things my way

reply

The Germans did practice a "scorched earth" policy as they retreated behind the Hindenburg line.

reply

Although WWI had its moments of a gentlemans war, remember this was 1914 and still a tradionally like European war, just like any other one in the past. It was any occupied territorys "duty" to serve any invading army with resources. But not surprisingly, of course people suffered hereof.

reply

Although WWI had its moments of a gentlemans war, remember this was 1914 and still a tradionally like European war, just like any other one in the past.


But it wasn't 1914. The Germans have steel helmets, it must be at least 1916.
There is a sudden and unexplained jump from autumn 1914 to summer? 1916.

reply

They did more than that, they would also rape then murder the women of the homes, they were savages and I am glad they didn't show that in film, I think it's understood that's what happened to Emilie because when the soldier was discussing her with the grandfather he said, we'll return in Spring and also the comment of the soldier saying "is she ill?" The grandfather had to threaten to kill them. I imagine that's what happened to her mother and why the father died, defending her. I've always said if anybody truly lost in those wars it was women because they were not given weapons to fight, they were left to their own doomed fate.

reply

On second thought, maybe she really was sickly lol!

reply

The German army was ruthless in stripping the local lands for food & other necessities. Their army wasn't good at supplying rations so the troops were encouraged to forage or they would starve.

reply

[deleted]

What sort of yogurt?

Maj. John Sheppard: Hi, folks. I hope I didn't crash-land on anybody.

reply

Look, if the OP thinks that the Germans taking food and supplies from the land they had invaded was over the top, he/she should really read about German conduct during that war. Especially what they got up to in Belgium. It was completely plausible as I'm sure the German supply lines were suffering at that time and they weren't shy about grabbing food from people they saw as their enemies.

reply

[deleted]

It's not like the Germans were the pinnacle of moral conduct in either of the world wars...

reply

I thought it was ridiculous the jam maker had all that white sugar lying around like there wasn't a war going on.

reply