I don't think you make a good argument for her being more level headed despite her supposed lack of knowledge. She was aware of the virus situation, she was aware they were told to stay in doors, she was aware after a few days that the situation was not normal. As someone else on the board said, she was the embodiment of the apathetic, It'll all pan out eventually type of character. Apart from the occasional thing she did, like changing the lights, she acted as if the situation were just a temporary crisis and life would return to normal. During the crisis she acted as she normally would.
There are also some instances in which she should have been able to tell, despite her husband's lies, that something more than him helping someone fix something was going on. Gunshots, explosions in the building, etc. The way her husband acted when the old guy came looking for him. All of that would have led my wife to the conclusion that I was not telling the whole truth and she would've called me on it. Instead, with Pipi, we get an annoyed nag who treats Coco the same as before the epidemic. At least with Coco, although he got help from Horacio, we saw him change and grow from a lazy apathetic guy into a survivalist veteran with plot induced hints of stupidity at the end, such as not agreeing to take Horacio's daughter.
While I agree that Coco should not have continued to lie to Pipi, I imagine she would not have believed him or would have freaked out and complained much more had he been telling her the truth of the situations. Maybe he thought she couldn't handle it...I mean look at how she was acting after finding out about the virus. Imagine how she would have acted to learn there was a mini war going on in her own apartment building. That an old man had murdered an entire family without hesitation simply because the patriarch of the family attempted to kill him. The list goes on and on.
I don't give Coco a pass for his stupidity up until he wised up nor do I give Pipi a pass for being an ultra nag.
reply
share