What sense does it make to skip the 2nd and 3rd books?
With the news of the next installment coming from a new director and a new screenwriter the word is that they will also skip to the 4th book of the series instead.
Does anyone else think that this is incredibly stupid?
Firstly, the first movie ends on a cliffhanger. A cliffhanger meant to be picked up in the next book/film.
Second, while I haven't read the books, I have seen the first films adaptations of the books from Sweden and it's clear that the first movie is mostly just a set-up for the story line that follows in the 2nd and 3rd movie. All of these plot lines that are meant to be developed exist in the American film adaptation. Skipping to the 4th book makes the existence of the first movie meaningless.
Third, if they plan on this to be a series then skipping to the 4th book is unwise because they would have to wait for more books to be made before they can film another movie. And if they plan on going back to the 2nd and 3rd books after they film the 4th book then that is even more nonsensical because they could've just done that in the first place.
This whole decision just makes absolutely no sense.