For it to be "science", it has to be observable and REPEATABLE. To repeat it, that means you have to have a certain control over what you're studying, the environment it's in, or both. There has to be a degree of specific predictability, and objective checks/cross-checks for the results that were predicted.
By nature, if it really IS paranormal, it is more or less an uncontrollable & unpredictable unknown. You simply have science at an extreme disadvantage from the get-go.
That doesn't mean it's impossible at all. I think people are being intellectually lazy and the real scientists are more or less incapable of performing proper study, because to do it right you need to spend time with big-boy toys, and for that you need funding.
So the basic answer to problem is money. Ironic.
However, I did mention that some of it is intellectual laziness. For example, the lazy treatment of EVP studies.
First off, there needs to be a thorough study done to reveal a set of words that are most likely to be an actual voice. Hypothetically, let's say this study reveals that the words are Cellar Door.
Now track down hauntings where the entity is all about "getting you to leave".
Tell it, "If you say Cellar Door, I will leave."
Get it to say the magic words, then leave.
Now find a similar haunting case and REPEAT.
Now you're starting to collect some evidence.
reply
share